205. The Court notes that the representatives did not provide any evidence to prove the consequential damages. The representatives did not specify the nature of the expenses incurred by these events, beyond describing them in general terms. Thus, they did not indicate the approximate amounts of those expenses, or who paid for them. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Court presumes, as it has done in previous cases 235, that Mr. Flores Bedregal's next of kin have incurred various expenses in the search for justice in this case. 206. Consequently, this Court establishes, in equity, the sum of USD$15,000.00 (fifteen thousand United States dollars) for consequential damages in favor of the victims. The State must divide the amount in equal parts and deliver the proportional part to each of the following persons: Olga Beatriz, Verónica, Eliana Isbelia, and Lilian Teresa, all with the surnames Flores Bedregal. The share of deceased persons must be distributed among their heirs. D.1.2. Loss of Income 207. The Commission requested reparation for the human rights violations in the instant case in the material aspect, including fair compensation. The representatives argued that, at the time of the forced disappearance, Mr. Flores Bedregal was 27 years old and serving as a deputy, so multiplying his monthly salary of USD$3,000 (three thousand United States dollars) by the number of months up to 52 years, which corresponds to the life expectancy of the time, this item would amount to USD$975,000.00 (nine hundred and seventy-five thousand United States dollars), and requested the Court to order the State to pay that amount. 208. The State reiterated that the Flores Bedregal sisters had the possibility of obtaining payment of lost profits through a civil proceeding derived from the two judgments issued in the national jurisdiction. Therefore, it stated that the claim of the Flores Bedregal sisters is not viable. 209. According to the allegations of the parties, Juan Carlos Flores Bedregal was serving as a deputy in the National Congress at the time of the facts. However, there is not enough evidence relating to his income. Therefore, the Court decides to establish, in equity, the sum of USD$100,000.00 (one hundred thousand United States dollars), for loss of income in favor of Juan Carlos Flores Bedregal. This amount must be distributed in equal parts between Olga Beatriz, Verónica, Eliana Isbelia, and Lilian Teresa, all with the surnames Flores Bedregal. The share of deceased persons shall be distributed among their heirs. With respect to Ms. Adela Hortensia Villamil, who does not appear as an injured party in this case, the Court understands that she reached a direct agreement with the State on measures of satisfaction and compensation. 236 D.2. Non-pecuniary damage 210. Regarding the non-pecuniary damages, the Commission requested reparation for the moral human rights violations in this case, including fair compensation. For their part, the 235 Cf. Case of Human Rights Defender et al. v. Guatemala, supra, para. 271, and Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, supra, para. 125. 236 In this regard, as reported by the State, the agreement apparently consists of a pecuniary reparation consisting of: a) a single payment, which is in progress for material reparation; b) a single payment for the death of the former deputy in the performance of his duties, and c) a monthly life annuity, which was in progress in payrolls, as of January by the National Distribution Service (SENASIR). 58