affidavit, which correspond to Federico Andrés Paulo Andreu Guzmán, Guiomar Hylea Bejarano Gerke, and Marcelo Pablo Pacheco Camacho. 222. In a note from the Secretariat of the Court of April 1, 2022, a report was sent to the State on the expenditure made in application of the Victims' Legal Assistance Fund for in this case, which amounted to the sum of USD$6,641.79 (six thousand six hundred and forty-one United States Dollars and seventy-nine cents) and, pursuant to Article 5 of the Court's Rules of Procedure on the Operation of the Fund, a period of time was granted for Bolivia to submit any observations it deemed pertinent. The State presented its observations on the FALV report on April 13, 2022, in which it indicated that the amounts disbursed are excessive, due to the statements made before a notary public by Lilian Teresa and Verónica, both Flores Bedregal, under the Plurinational Notarial Tariff (Administrative Resolution N0.013/2015 of May 27, 2015) which establishes that the cost of a voluntary declaration is Bs.50 (fifty Bolivianos). It also said that the amounts disbursed by the two expert reports (psychological evaluation, which according to the table includes a forensic expert opinion) on Ms. Veronica, Teresa, and Olga, all with the surnames Flores Bedregal, are excessive, since, according to the Fees of the College of Psychologists of La Paz, the cost of each expert is Bs.3,500.00 (three thousand five hundred Bolivianos). 223. Regarding the State's observations, the Court notes that in reference to the fee charged for voluntary declaration (notarial form) by the professional in charge of the service, it coincides with the amount established in the tariff table of the DIRNOPLU (Directorate of Plurinational Notaries, from the Spanish) to which the State refers. However, given the length of the affidavit, this Court understands that the costs of professional and notarial services entail additional costs, so it considers that the amounts accredited by the statements rendered before a notary public are within reasonable standards for such actions. On the other hand, this Court notices that the State sent a tariff schedule from the "Colegio de Psicólogos" (College of Psychologists) of La Paz for Management 2022, however, the costs that were reimbursed by the Court for this case, with regard to expert opinions, date from November 2019 and March 2020. In addition, the Court observes that the tariff schedule establishes the cost of expert opinions per person and, in this case, received two expert reports authorized to be covered by the FALV, each of which contains the evaluation of three victims. 224. In light of Article 5 of the Rules of Procedure of the Fund, due to the violations declared in this judgment and that the requirements for eligibility for the Fund were met, the Court orders that the State reimburse the Fund for the amount of USD$6,641.79 (six thousand six hundred and forty-one United States dollars and seventy-nine cents) for the necessary expenses incurred. This amount must be reimbursed within six months of notification of this judgment. G. Method of compliance with the ordered payments 225. The State shall pay the compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and the reimbursement of costs and expenses established in this judgment directly to the person(s) indicated therein, within a period of one year from the notification of this judgment, without prejudice to the possibility of advancing full payment within a shorter period, in the terms of the following paragraphs. 226. In the event that the beneficiary has died or dies before the corresponding compensation has been paid, the compensation shall be paid directly to his or her heirs in keeping with the applicable domestic law. 62