24 human rights and international humanitarian law training program, in view of the fact that these are permanent programs. * * * Publication of the Judgment (operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment) 65. That, as to the obligation to publish in the official gazette Diario Oficial and in another national-coverage daily, the pertinent parts of the Judgment, the State informed that on April 10, 2006 it published the section of the Judgment on Proven facts- without the corresponding footnotes-, paragraphs 101 to 123 of the Section on International Responsibility of the State, as well as the operative paragraph of the Judgment, in the Official Gazette as well as in an additional offspring to "El Tiempo” newspaper, which distributes 270.000 copies. The State furnished examples of these publications and requested the Court to consider the operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment to be fulfilled. The representatives and the Commission confirmed the fact that the State made such publications. 66. That, as a result, this Court considers that the State has duly complied with the obligation to publish the pertinent parts of the Judgment, under the terms stipulated therein. * * * Payment of compensatory amounts and reimbursement of costs and expenses (operative paragraph fifteen, sixteen and seventeen of the Judgment) 67. That as to the payment of the amounts set forth for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage, as well as the reimbursement of costs and expenses, the State informed that, by means of two resolutions of 2007 and one of 2008, the Ministry of Defense ordered and paid the following compensatory amounts: all the compensatory amounts to the next-of-kin of the victims already identified in the Judgment; some of the compensatory amounts to some of the victims who have not been identified in the Judgment (next-of-kin of Edwin Morales, Georgina Pinzón and Wilson Molina Pinto), the costs to the victims' attorneys (Colectivo de Abogados "José Alvear Restrepo" and CEJIL). In this sense, the State requested the Court to study the documents presented and to declare this measure of reparation to be fulfilled in relation to the people identified in the resolutions. 68. That, the representatives expressed that the State has complied with the orders given by the Court in that sense, with a normal delay in the processing of the payments. Nevertheless, they noted that the obligation to pay the compensations shall not be limited to the victims’ next-of-kin who were recognized in the Judgment, but that the amounts shall also cover those persons to be identified as victims or next-of-kin of victims. They inform that they know 10 persons who appeared as a result of the announcement, but they do not have information on the process of identification. 69. That the Commission valued that the State has made the payment of the compensatory amounts, costs and expenses ordered by the Tribunal. 70. That the Court positively values what was informed by the State and the representatives as to the fact that the State has made the corresponding payment of the compensatory amounts ordered in favor of the identified victims and next-of-kin, as well as the costs and expenses in favor of the representatives. As a result, the