31 although the State failed to comply with Articles I(d) and III of the IACFDP, in relation to Article 2 of the American Convention, such non-compliance was corrected by the State. IX REPARATIONS (APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 63(1) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION) 106. It is a principle of International Law that any violation of an international obligation that has caused damage entails the duty to provide adequate reparation.93 The Court has based its decisions on this particular subject pursuant to the provisions of Article 63(1) of the American Convention.94 107. Within the framework of the acknowledgment made by the State (supra para. 11 to 15), in accordance with the above considerations on the merits and the violations of the Convention declared to be such in the preceding chapters, as well as in the light of the criteria embodied in the Court’s case- law in connection with the nature and scope of the obligation to make reparations,95 the Court shall now address the requests for reparations made by the Commission and the representatives, as well as the State’s observations thereof, in order to adopt the measures required to reparation the damage. A) Injured Party 108. The Tribunal recalls that an injured party is considered to be the victim of a violation of some of the rights enshrined in the Convention. In this sense, the Court considers that Renato Ticona Estrada, Honoria Estrada de Ticona, César Ticona Olivares, Hugo Ticona, Rodo Ticona and Betzy Ticona are the "injured parties", in their capacity of victims of the violations declared in the previous chapters, and therefore, they shall be entitled to the reparations ordered by the Tribunal as pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. B) Compensation 109. The Court notes that in the cases of forced disappearance of people, it is evident the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage caused to the disappeared victim, as well as his relatives. In this sense, before a serious and multiple violations such as this, it is incidental that the disappeared person suffers from different physical, moral and mental damages, as well as pecuniary damage. Moreover, the relatives of the victim may experiment suffering, anguish and pecuniary damage, within the family environment, as well as other kind of affections. 93 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 21, 1989. Series C Nº. 7, para. 25; Case of Heliodoro Portugal v. Panamá, supra note 13, para. 217; and Case of Bayarri v. Argentina, supra note 16, para. 119. 94 Article 63(1) of the Convention provides that: If the Court finds that there has been a violation of a right or freedom protected by [this] Convention, the Court shall rule that the injured party be ensured the enjoyment of his right or freedom that was violated. It shall also rule, if appropriate, that the consequences of the measure or situation that constituted the breach of such right or freedom be remedied and that fair compensation be paid to the injured party. 95 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez, supra note 93, para. 25 to 27; Case of Castañeda Gutman v. Mexico, supra note 17 para. 215; and Case of Heliodoro Portugal v. Panamá, supra note 13, para. 218.