32 110. The reparations must have a causal link with the facts of the case, the alleged violations, the proven damages, as well as with the measures requested to repair the resulting damages. Therefore, the Court must observe such coincidence in order to adjudge and declare according to law. a) Pecuniary damage 111. The Court’s case law has developed the concept of pecuniary damage and the cases in which compensation therefore is due.96 In this section, the Tribunal shall refer to the possible pecuniary damages (consequential damages and loss of income) suffered by Renato Ticona and his relatives, so that it is possible to determine the corresponding reparations. Regarding Renato Ticona 112. The Commission requested the Court to equitably determine the amount of compensation for consequential damages and “loss of income” of Renato Ticona and his relatives. Moreover, the representative requested the Court to consider the following information when determining the loss of income of Renato Ticona during his remaining and probable life expectancy: i) Renato Ticona as a music teacher.97 The income he would have received from July, 1980 to December, 1982 amounts to US$2.004, 75 (two thousand and four dollars of the United States of America and seventy-five cents)98 and considering the fact that there is no supporting documentation on the salary that Renato Ticona received, the representative requested the Court to equitably determine a sum; and ii) Renato Ticona as future agricultural engineer Mr. Ticona Estrada would have started working as agricultural engineer in the year 1983, at the age of 28 years old, who, in accordance with the life- expectancy of 64 years, would have worked until the year 2019, that is, 36 more years. The probable income, based on a monthly average of US$1.027.00 (one thousand and twenty-seven dollars of the United States of America), that Renato Ticona would have received, as agricultural engineer, amounts to US$360.477.00 (three hundred and sixty thousand four hundred seventy-seven dollars of the Unites States of America).99 96 Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez V. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 22, 2002. Series C Nº 91, para. 43; Case of Heliodoro Portugal v. Panamá, supra note 13, para. 221; and Case of Bayarri v. Argentina, supra note 16, para. 127. 97 In accordance with the information provided by the relatives, Renato Ticona would stop working as a music teacher once he would have obtained his professional degree. The foregoing means that he would have continued working as a music teacher for two years and a half more, until December, 1982. 98 The representative stated that the salary of Renato Ticona as music teacher in the years 1977 and 1978 amounted to Bs. 866.71 (eight hundred and sixty-six Bolivian pesos with seventy-one cents). Nevertheless, it was impossible to determine the salary he received between 1979 and June, 1980 and the salary he would have received from July 1980 to December 1982. As a consequence, in order to estimate the salary of a music teacher, it was considered the minimum salary in force on September 19, 2008, which amounted to Bs. 575.00 (five hundred and seventy-five Bolivian pesos) which is equal to US$ 81.00 (eighty-one dollars of the United States of America). 99 According to the representative, in order to do the corresponding estimation, it requested information to the Society of Engineers of Bolivia ("SIB") and the Professional Association of Agricultural Engineers of Bolivia- District of La Paz ("CIAB-LP"). The SIB pointed out that the average salary, per month, would be US$ 950.00 (nine hundred and fifty dollars of the United States of America) and the