34 circumstance allows establishing, with sufficient certainty, the activity or profession that Renato Ticona would do in the future and therefore to establish the income corresponding to such profession. Based on the foregoing, the Court sets the amount of US$170.000.00 (one hundred seventy thousand dollars of the United States of America), on equitable grounds, as it has established in other cases.102 In order to do so, the Court has considered his job as a teacher as from the year 1980, his possible role as agricultural engineer as from the year 1985103 until the year 2019, his age and life expectancy.104 117. Said compensation for pecuniary damage corresponding to Renato Ticona shall be distributed among his relatives, as follows: Fifty percent (50%) shall be delivered to his parents, Honoria Estrada de Ticona and César Ticona Olivares, in equal portions. The remaining fifty percent (50%) shall be equally distributed among his brothers and sister, Hugo Ticona, Rodo Ticona and Betzy Ticona. Said amount shall be delivered to each beneficiary within the term of one year as from notice of this Judgment. Regarding Renato Ticona’s relatives 118. The Commission requested the Court the payment of pecuniary damages in favor of the relatives of Renato Ticona. Moreover, the representatives stated that the different members of Ticona Estrada's family took several steps in order to search for the victim and access to justice. According to the representative, César Ticona Olivares set aside all his income, as well as the earnings of Hugo, Rodo and Betzy and the savings of the family to pay for the expenses related to the search and whereabouts of the victim. These expenses include expenses for travels that, in approximately 28 years, the parents of Renato and his brother Hugo would have done from the city of Oruro to the city of La Paz and from the city of Cochabamba to the city of La Paz, as well as the accommodation, food, correspondence, telegrams, telefax, telephone calls, photocopies of documentation that was sent to different public authorities; therefore, the representative set in equity the amount of US$6.720.00 (six thousand seven hundred and twenty dollars of the United States of America). 119. Furthermore, the representative expressed that as a consequence of the facts, César Ticona Olivares, Honoria Estrada de Ticona and Hugo Ticona suffered from physical and mental distress and have incurred in a series of expenses; but, considering the time spent, it is not possible to present the corresponding receipts and therefore the representative requested the Court to determine in equity the amount of US$10.000.00 (ten thousand dollars of the United States of America) as medical expenses. 120. Moreover, the State requested the Court to consider the compensation for travels and national and international telephone calls, following the criterion 102 Cf. Case of Trujillo Oroza v. Bolivia, supra note 67, para. 73, Case of Ituango Massacres, supra note 9, para. 373; Case of La Rochela Massacre v. Colombia. Merits, reparations, and costs. Judgment of May 11, 2007. Series C Nº. 163, para. 248. 103 The Court took into account the information provided by the State and the representative regarding the graduation date of Renato Ticona, since the University Ticona Estrada was studying at, remained closed during some time. As a consequence, the Tribunal considers pertinent to establish the year 1985 as the year from which the victim initiated his profession as agricultural engineer. 104 Cf. Case of the “White Van” (Paniagua Morales et al.) v. Guatemala, supra note 15, para. 94; Case of Molina Theissen v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 3, 2004. Series C Nº. 108, para. 57, and Case of La Rochela Massacre v. Colombia, supra note 102, para. 248.