the application of the specialized medical-psychological evaluation for cases of possible torture,’ which was taught 13 times from January 23, 2012 to December 9, 2012, and in which 423 public officials of the PGR participated.” Similarly, the State reported that, “from 2008 to 2011, the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Republic has implemented the course titled ‘The implementation of the Istanbul Protocol in the Institutions of [M]exican State,’ in the following states of the Republic: Puebla, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, Sinaloa, Nayarit, State of Mexico, Guerrero, Monterrey, Yucatan, Tlaxcala, and Chiapas.” 54. With regards to the programs carried out by the Office of the Prosecutor General of Justice of the state of Guerrero, the State indicated that “[i]n August of 2012, the Office of the Prosecutor General of Justice of the state of Guerrero offered a ‘Course on Human Rights’ at the Institute of Vocational Training, which was aimed at deputy prosecutors, experts, and agents of the State Police.” 55. As to the Federal Council of the Judicature, the State reported that “in coordination with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Commission of Superior Courts of Justice, the Mexican Association of [D]ispensers of Justice, and the OUNHCHR, it had organized the event ‘Itinerant Workshops: The Impact of the Constitutional Reform of Amparo and of Human Rights on Jurisdictional Activities.’” Furthermore, “[i]n April of 2012, it launched the ‘Integral Master Program in Human Rights and Democracy,” organized in conjunction with the Latin American School of Social Sciences, and the OUNHCHR.” Similarly, it implemented the “Itinerant Introductory Seminar on the Constitutional Reform of Human Rights,” directed at heads of the superior courts of justice. Along the same lines, “[i]n September and October of 2012, in conjunction with the Procuraduría Social de Atención a las Víctimas de Delitos [Social Services Office for Attention to Crime Victims], the ‘Interdisciplinary Seminar on discussions regarding the right to reparations for violations of human rights,’ was developed; the objective of this seminar was to analyze the relationship between the constitutional reform of human rights, the reform of the criminal justice system, and the reform of amparo in the sphere of the right to reparations.” 56. The State further indicated that “[t]he Judiciary of the state of Guerrero has launched a professionalization program for public officials, through which the following activities have been implemented: Seminar on ‘Constitutional Reforms on Human Rights and Amparo,’ taught on August 30, 2012 and September 1, 2012, and which was directed at public officials of the Judiciary in Chilpancingo, Guerrero. The conference ‘Strengthening the Ethical Culture in the Judiciary in the State of Guerrero’ was held on August 25, 2012 in Chilpancingo, Guerrero. On July 3, 2012, the conference ‘The Ethics of the Judiciary’ was delivered to public officers of the judiciary and of administrative support. The magisterial conferences ‘Human rights in the system of protection to women in criminal proceedings’ and ‘Precautionary measures as mechanisms of protection for women who have been victims of violence’ were held on November 6, 2012. On December 3, 4, and 5, 2012, a workshop was held titled ‘International instruments of protection for human rights in constitutional reforms.’” 57. Regarding the information set forth by the State in the preceding paragraphs, the representatives expressed that “[o]n July 26, 2012, [they forwarded] to the Secretariat of the Interior a proposal on the trainings with guidelines they consider[ed] necessary for full compliance with this operative paragraph.” The representatives noted that they had not received a response regarding their request and, thus, urged the State “to present data or figures on the results [of the programs and trainings].” 18