8 * * * 24. That the matters that have not yet been complied with must be fulfilled by the State as soon as possible. Therefore, it is necessary that Ecuador forward a report on the matters pending compliance indicated by the Court (infra second declarative paragraph), and that subsequently the representative of the victim and his next of kin, as well as the Inter-American Commission, present their observations to the State’s report. 25. That the Court will consider the general status of compliance with its judgments on merits of November 12, 1997, and on reparations of January 20, 1999, when it has received the State’s report and the corresponding observations. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions and in accordance with Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 25(1) of its Statute and Article 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That pursuant to that stated in Considering Clauses number 7 and 8, the State of Ecuador, the representative of the victim and his next of kin, have failed to comply with the duty to adequately inform the Tribunal. 2. That it will keep the proceeding on monitoring compliance in this case open, as regards the following matters that are pending compliance: a) payment of the corresponding compensation to the minor Micaela Suárez Ramadán (second operative paragraph of the Judgment on reparations), and b) the investigation and punishment of the people responsible for the human rights violations declared by the Court (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment on merits). AND DECIDES: 1. To urge the State of Ecuador, pursuant to that exposed in Considering Clause number 14, to deposit as soon as possible the compensation that corresponds to the minor Micaela Suárez Ramadán, plus the corresponding interests, in a national solvent financial institution, to the minor’s name. 2. To urge the State, pursuant to that exposed in Considering Clauses number 15 through 23, to reopen the investigations within the domestic jurisdiction in order to determine the people responsible for the human rights violations declared in the Judgment on merits (supra Having Seen paragraph 1) and, eventually, punish them. 3. To urge the State to adopt all measures necessary to offer an effective and prompt compliance to the matters pending compliance that were ordered by the Tribunal in the Judgments on Merits and Reparations (supra Having Seen paragraphs 1