ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 3, 2001 PROVISIONAL MEASURES LOAYZA TAMAYO CASE HAVING SEEN: 1. The brief of November 30, 2000, and its annexes, received by the Secretariat of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the InterAmerican Court”) on December 5, 2000, in which Michelangela Scalabrino submitted to the Court a request for provisional measures in relation to the Loayza Tamayo case regarding Peru (hereinafter “Peru” or “the State”), in the name of María Elena Loayza Tamayo (hereinafter “Mrs. Loayza Tamayo”), pursuant to Article 63.2 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”) and Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”). In this brief, Mrs. Scalabrino requested the Court: [to] take urgently all provisional measures so that María Elena Loayza Tamayo may recover the amount of money established by the Court as fair compensation, together with the interest thereon and other material and moral damages relating to the violations arising from non-compliance with the judgment on reparations by Peru, which will allow her to emerge from the misery in which she is living, cease to live on charity and begin to enjoy a “worthwhile life”; [so that] she may develop a new (although limited) life path, begin new professional training which she is able to do abroad, while her personal situation continues to be insecure in Peru; [so that] she can take care of her health appropriately; [and so that] she can defray her children’s needs, personally and directly, after having suffered the humiliation that they are cared for by their grandparents and aunts. Mrs. Scalabrino also stated that the provisional measures could: include, if necessary: accounts and/or sums of money that the Peruvian State has abroad or is about to receive from abroad (from other States that are Parties to the Convention or not, or from international organizations) [and that these] should be made available to the victim up to the amount to which the Court declares the victim has the right; [also] that, in this case, the Court [...] should rule that the victim and/or her lawyers should receive all necessary assistance to recover this amount in the place where she is; [and] that the ad hoc expenses and fees arising from the necessary actions shall be included in the amount. Mrs. Scalabrino based the request for provisional measures on the following considerations: a) The Court retains competence to decide on this request, because the case is at the procedural stage of the execution of the judgment on reparations, and also because the victim is legally authorized to act before the Court to this end; b) The State has still not fulfilled the Court’s mandate that, in accordance with the Court’s Order of November 17, 1999, it comply rapidly with the judgment on reparations delivered on November 27, 1998;