8. To require the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights to present their observations on the reports indicated in the preceding operative paragraph within four and six weeks, respectively, of their notification. 9. To require the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures to present a detailed report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the situation of risk of each of the beneficiaries of these provisional measures and with regard to the possible situation of risk of Luis Alberto Bolívar, by March 2, 2012, at the latest, in accordance with considering paragraphs 13 to 28, 34, 35 and 42 to 45 of th[e] Order. 2. The briefs of March 2 and April 27, 2012, in which the representatives of the beneficiaries (hereinafter “the representatives”) and the Argentine Republic (hereinafter “the State” or “Argentina”) presented, respectively, the reports required in the seventh and ninth operative paragraphs of the Court’s Order of November 25, 2011 (supra having seen paragraph 1). In their brief of March 2, 2012, the representatives asked the Court, inter alia, “to maintain [these] provisional measures” in favor of the beneficiaries and to expand them to Iván Eladio Torres Millacura, Mia Iriel Torres and Zoe Cristal Torres. 3. The briefs of May 18 and July 2, 2012, in which the representatives and the State presented, respectively, their observations on the above-mentioned reports (supra having seen paragraphs 1 and 2). In their brief of May 18, 2012, the representatives reiterated the requests made in their brief of March 2, 2012 (supra having seen paragraph 2). In addition, the brief of May 31, 2012, in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission”) presented its observations on the State’s report of July 2, 2012. 4. The brief of October 3, 2012, in which the representatives reiterated the requests made in their briefs of March 2 and May 18, 2012 (supra having seen paragraphs 2 and 3), and requested the expansion of the provisional measures to Guillermo Flores and Verónica Heredia. Also, the brief of October 6, 2012, in which the representatives submitted additional information with regard to Mr. Flores. 5. The briefs of October 17 and 25, 2012, in which the Commission and the State, respectively, submitted their observations on the request to expand the provisional measures to Guillermo Flores and Verónica Heredia (supra having seen paragraph 4). In the said brief of October 25, 2012, the State also provided information on the implementation of these provisional measures. 6. The Order of the Inter-American Court of November 21, 2012, in which the Court rejected the request to expand the provisions measures to Iván Eladio Torres Millacura, Mia Iriel Torres, Zoe Cristal Torres and Verónica Heredia (supra having seen paragraphs 2 and 4). In the second operative paragraph of this order, the Court required the Argentine Republic and the representatives to provide the Court with a detailed report on the possible situation of risk of Guillermo Flores by February 4, 2013, at the latest. 7. The brief of December 4, 2012, in which the representatives of the beneficiaries forwarded information on presumed “incidents that had occurred with regard to Guillermo Flores after the request” to expand the provisional measures (supra having seen paragraph 4). In this brief, the representatives also requested the expansion of these measures to Alba Rosana Vera González, who lives with Mr. Flores. 8. The briefs of December 28, 2012, and January 8, 2013, in which the Inter-American Commission and the State, respectively, presented their observations on the information forwarded by the representatives in the brief of December 4, 2012 (supra having seen paragraph 2