47 177. The Court has developed in its case law the concept of pecuniary damages and has established that they presuppose “the loss of or the detriment to the income of the victims, the expenses incurred as a result of the facts, and the monetary consequences that have a causal nexus with the facts of the sub judice case.”225 E.1.1. Consequential damages 178. The representative indicated that it estimated a compensation of GTQ 300,000.00, which is the equivalent of USD 40,136.78, for consequential damages for each person, without specifying the reasons. 179. The Court notes that the representative did not explain the basis on which it requested the amount mentioned as compensation for each victim. Therefore, the Court will not order compensation for consequential damages. E.1.2. Lucro cesante (lost wages) 180. The representative expressed that it used as a criterion to calculate lost wages the guidelines established by the Court in the Villagrán Morales et al. v. Guatemala case.226 It manifested that it took as a reference the annual minimum salary in rural areas during the past six months as of the moment in which the massacre occurred for those who were adults and from the moment of reaching adulthood for those who were children in order to subsequently take into account vacations, extra month bonus at the end of the year, the “14” bonus (a month’s bonus on top of the extra month bonus) and annual compensation during the period. On that basis, the calculations were made by grouping the amounts according to the group of victims. 181. Deceased persons. Using that formula, the representative requested an amount for lost wages with respect to each of the 10 deceased victims, 227 indicating that the sum of each amount totals GTQ 55,133,009.76, the equivalent of USD 7,376,206.07. It considers that to that total should be added GTQ 531,273.81,228 the equivalent of USD 71,078.74, for interest due to the delay in complying with the reparations. Therefore, it requested a total of USD 7,447,284.81. 182. Injured persons. The representative requested an amount for lost wages for each of the 26 injured persons229 and indicated a total corresponding to the sum of each of those Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs, supra, para. 43 and Case of Amrhein et al. v. Costa Rica, supra, para. 487. 226 As the representative indicated, referring to that judgment, the calculation should be made taking into account the age of the victim at the date of death, the life expectancy, the victim’s job at the time of the events, the possible financial betterment and income and that real wages or, in their absence, the minimum wage for similar work in Guatemala should be employed (in the Villagrán Morales case, “non-agricultural” activities), using 12 monthly salaries for each year. 227 For “Maurilia” GTQ 7,672,792.92; for “Carlos” GTQ 7,707,511.44; for “Manuela” GTQ 7,290,889.20, for “Abel” GTQ 5,381,370.60; for “Pablo” GTQ 3,992,629.80; for “Juana” GTQ 3,124,666.80; for “Andrés” GTQ 2,256,703.80; for “Hilaria” GTQ 1,562,333.40; for “Pedro” GTQ 3,645,444.60, and for “Pedro” GTQ 4,687,000.20. (The representative, in making these requests, only indicated first names and not last names. It did refer to Santiago Coc in its brief with pleadings and motions but noted that he had no contact with his family, explaining that, for this reason, it could not make “requests for measures of reparation.”) 228 The representative requested for “Maurilia” GTQ 85,928.34; for “Carlos” GTQ 63,014.11; for “Manuela” GTQ 85,928.34; for “Abel” GTQ 63,014.11; for “Pablo” GTQ 46,349.22; for “Juana” GTQ 35,933.67; for “Andrés” GTQ 25,518.11; for “Hilaria” GTQ 17,185.67; for “Pedro” GTQ 42,183, and for “Pedro” GTQ 54,681.67. It explained that “it used the interest that the banks pay those who have long-term deposits.” 229 The names of those persons, as provided by the representative, are: “Pascual José Pascual”; “Santiago Maquín Quip”; “Rosendo Morales Ortíz”; “Víctor Carrillo Morales”; “Ricardo Pop Caal”; “Juana Felipe 225