Guatemala and, given the amount in question, they could have difficulty bringing the money into Costa Rica; therefore they proposed that the payment be made via bank transfer. To this end and in accordance with the State’s requirements, on May 30, 2011, CEJIL sent a draft settlement agreement to COPREDEH and is waiting for the payment to be made.” 56. The Commission assessed positively the information submitted by the parties and awaited specific data regarding the beneficiaries of the reparations. 57. Based on the above, the Court assesses positively the efforts made by the State to pay the compensation for non-pecuniary damage to 121 beneficiaries, 6 regarding whom the State submitted the respective proof of payment.7 In addition, this Court notes that, from the information provided by the parties, seven people have not collected the payment of the compensation, five people have not contacted COPREDEH to receive the corresponding payment, and 22 beneficiaries are deceased; in other words, 34 beneficiaries have not received the compensation payment. In this regard, the Court considers that the State and the representatives should coordinate the necessary measures to locate the people who have not received payment yet and, in the case of the deceased victims, the representatives should provide advice or initiate the appropriate legal measures or procedures so that their next of kin can receive the corresponding compensation. Furthermore, the State submitted the required information on the payment made to each victim, and the respective documentation, which was forwarded to the representatives and the Commission. At the date of this order, the Court is awaiting the observations of the Commission in this regard. 58. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Court has verified that the State has made the payment of compensation for non-pecuniary damage to 121 beneficiaries, and the payment of costs and expenses to FAMDEGUA; hence, it considers that the eighteenth operative paragraph has been complied with partially. Consequently, the Court finds it pertinent that the State continue to report on the measures taken and their results in relation to the 34 victims who have yet to receive payment, either because they have not contacted the State officials or because they are deceased. 59. Furthermore, regarding payment of the reimbursement of costs and expenses to CEJIL, the Court takes into account the observations of the State and the representatives, and awaits pertinent information concerning the payment. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 6 In this regard, it is worth emphasizing that the representatives confirmed the payment of compensation to 120 beneficiaries, regarding whom the State presented the corresponding proofs of payment. However, in the communication of July 4, 2011, the State included another beneficiary who had received the payment, and forwarded a copy of the corresponding cheque and proof of payment, but the representatives did not include the name of this person in the communication of July 4, 2011. Given that the Court has verified payment of the corresponding compensation to this beneficiary from the respective proofs of payment, the Court determines that the State has compensated 121 beneficiaries. 7 This Court notes that, with regard to the compensation payment for one of the victims, the stub of check No. 00000141 indicates a different amount to that indicated in proof of payment No. 28 and check No. 00000141. However, this Court understands that this person was paid the amount indicated in the last two documents mentioned. 16