USD 987.36 (nine hundred eighty-seven dollars and thirty-six cents of the United States of America) for the expenses incurred. This sum must be reimbursed within six months of notification of this judgment. G. Method of compliance with the payments ordered 90. The state shall make payment of the compensation for nonpecuniary damage and reimbursement of costs and expenses, as established in this judgment, directly to the persons indicated herein, within one year of notification of this judgment. 91. If the beneficiary has died or dies before he receives the respective compensation, it shall be delivered directly to his heirs, in accordance with applicable domestic law. 92. The state shall comply with its monetary obligations through payment in United States dollars, using the exchange rate in force on the New York Stock Exchange (United States of America), on the day before payment in order to make the respective calculation. 93. If, for reasons that can be attributed to the beneficiaries of the compensation or their heirs, it is not possible to pay the amounts established within the time frame indicated, the state shall deposit these amounts in an account or certificate of deposit in their favor in a solvent Argentine financial institution, in United States dollars, and on the most favorable financial terms permitted by the state’s law and banking practice. If, after 10 years, the compensation has not been claimed, the amounts shall revert to the state with the accrued interest. 94. The amounts assigned in this judgment as compensation for nonpecuniary damage, and to reimburse costs and expenses shall be delivered to the persons indicated integrally, as established in this judgment, without any deductions resulting from possible taxes or charges. 95. If the state should fall into arrears, including with the reimbursement of expenses to the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund, it shall pay interest on the amount owed corresponding to banking interest on arrears in Argentina. X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, Unanimously, 1. To dismiss the preliminary objection filed by the state regarding the Court's lack of jurisdiction to carry out the requested review of compliance with human rights conventions, in the terms of paragraphs 19 to 21 of this judgment. DECLARES, Unanimously, that: 2. The state is responsible for the violation of the right to appeal a ruling, as set forth in Article 8(2)(h) of the American Convention, read in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same 26