13 d) Leave without effect, in all its points, the convictions issued against Mr. Humberto Antonio Palamara Iribarne: the judgment of January 3, 1995 of the Army’s Court-Martial in Case No. 471 for the crime of contempt and the judgments issued by said Court-Martial in Case No. 464 on January 3, 1997 and by the Naval Court of Magallanes on June 10, 1996 for the crimes of disobedience and non-compliance of military duties (twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment); e) Pay Mr. Humberto Antonio Palamara Iribarne the amounts set as compensation for pecuniary damages in paragraphs 239, 242, and 243 of the […] Judgment (sixteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment); f) Pay Mr. Humberto Antonio Palamara Iribarne the amount set as compensation for non-pecuniary damage in paragraph 248 of the […] Judgment (seventeenth operative paragraph of the Judgment); and g) Pay Mr. Humberto Antonio Palamara Iribarne the amount set for costs and expenses in paragraph 260 of the […] Judgment (eighteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment). 40. That the Court values positively that the State has complied with the majority of the reparations ordered by the Tribunal and that it has presented information regarding the totality of the measures of reparation set in the Judgment of November 22, 2005. 41. That the Court considers it essential that the State present updated information on the operative paragraphs of the Judgment of November 22, 2005 that are pending compliance, which are specified below: a) Adopt all the measures necessary to annul and modify, within a reasonable term, any domestic norms that are not compatible with international standards in matters of freedom of thought and expression, in the terms of the paragraphs 254 and 255 of the present Judgment. (thirteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment). Specifically, the Inter-American Court asks the State to present detailed information on the measures put in action to comply with the Judgment in this sense, including the presentation of bills and documents of interest, as well as reports on the stages and estimated terms for compliance with this point of the Judgment. (supra Considering Clause number 26). b) Adjust the domestic juridical ordinance to international standards on military criminal jurisdiction, in such a way that in the case that it considers the existence of a military criminal jurisdiction necessary, the same must be limited only to knowing of crimes of duty committed by soldiers in active service. Therefore, the State must establish, through its legislation, limits to the material and personal competence of the military courts, ensuring that in no circumstance will a civilian be submitted to the jurisdiction of military criminal courts (fourteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment). c) Guarantee the due process in the military criminal jurisdiction and the judicial protection regarding the actions of the military authorities (fifteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment). Specifically, the Inter-American Court considers it necessary that Chile: a) continue providing updated and detailed information regarding the measures put in action to comply with the fourteenth and fifteenth operative paragraphs of the Judgment, including the sending of bills and relevant documents; b) that is specifically inform on the advances in the