previously indicated in this judgment (supra Chapter VII.2), the State must conduct the necessary investigations to determine the responsibility for the facts that occurred to the detriment of David Octavio Díaz Loreto, Robert Ignacio Díaz Loreto and Octavio Ignacio Díaz Álvarez, and of their family members. C. Measures of satisfaction C.1. Publication and dissemination of the judgment 144. The representatives asked that the Court require the publication of the sections on context and proven facts, together with the operative paragraphs of the judgment, in the Official Gazette and in a national newspaper. Neither the Commission nor the State referred to this request. 145. The Court establishes, as it has in other cases,174 that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this judgment: (a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette and in a national newspaper with widespread circulation in the State of Venezuela, in an adequate and legible font, and (b) this judgment in its entirety, available for at least one year on a website of the Public Prosecution Service, in a way that is accessible to the public from the home page of this website. 146. The State must advise the Court immediately when it has made each of the said publications, regardless of the one-year time frame to present its first report established in the ninth operative paragraph of this judgment. C.2. Public act to acknowledge international responsibility 147. The representatives asked that the Court order the holding of a public act in Aragua state to acknowledge international responsibility and make a public apology in relation to the facts of this case. 148. As it has in other cases,175 this Court finds it necessary, in order to redress the harm caused to the victims, to avoid events such as those of this case being repeated, and in response to the request of the representatives, to require the State to organize a public act in Aragua state to acknowledge international responsibility in relation to the facts of this case. During this act, the State must refer to the facts and human rights violations declared in this judgment, and it must take place in a public ceremony that must be disseminated by the media and attended by senior state officials. In addition, the participation of those who have been declared victims in this judgment must be ensured. The place, date and other details of this public ceremony must be duly consulted with the victims or their representatives. The State must comply with this obligation within one year of notification of this judgment. C.3. Other measures of satisfaction requested 149. In their brief with final arguments, the representatives asked that the State be ordered to take all necessary administrative or civil measures to facilitate the return to the living members Díaz Loreto family of the ownership and possession of the family home located in La Segundera, Cagua. They also asked that the Court order the State to grant a scholarship to Arianna Leaneth Díaz Doubain. The State, in its final written arguments, indicated that the factual framework of the proceedings was constituted by the facts contained in the Merits Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Romero Feris v. Argentina, para. 185. 174 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru, para. 81, and Case of Women Victims of Sexual Torture in Atenco v. Mexico, paras. 347 and 348. 175 -42-