the family incurred diverse expenses due to the death of the Díaz Loreto brothers and their father. Regarding the expenditure incurred to obtain justice, the Court has no evidence that would prove the disbursements argued by the representatives. However, it considers that, in order to find out what happened to the victims, their family members took steps before state authorities, including preparing documents, providing testimonial statements, transportation and daily expenses. The Court finds that the State should provide compensation for such expenses because they have a direct causal nexus to the violations in this case. 184 Consequently, the Court finds it pertinent to establish, in equity, for pecuniary damage the sum of US$50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars with six cents [sic]), in favor of Octavio Ignacio Díaz Álvarez; the sum of US$50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars with six cents), in favor of David Octavio Díaz Loreto, and the sum of US$50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars with six cents), in favor of Robert Ignacio Díaz Loreto. F.2. Non-pecuniary damage 163. The representatives asked that, for non-pecuniary damages owing to the murder of the victims Octavio Ignacio Díaz Álvarez, David Octavio Díaz Loreto and Robert Ignacio Díaz Loreto, the Court order the State to pay the sum of US$100,000 (one hundred thousand United States dollars) for each victim. They indicated that this sum should be delivered as follows: in equal parts to their surviving children and siblings and, in the case of the deceased sons, this would correspond to their heirs. In addition, they asked that the Court determine compensation, based on equity, of US$50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars) for each of the direct members of the Díaz Loreto family or family group, and the heirs of the deceased. 164. The Court, based on its consistent case law,185 and taking into account the circumstances of this case, establishes, in equity, the following amounts in favor of the victims as compensation for non-pecuniary damage: (a) David Octavio Díaz Loreto, Robert Ignacio Díaz Loreto and Octavio Ignacio Díaz Álvarez, US$100.000 (on hundred thousand United States dollars) each; (b) Juana Emilia Loreto Pérez, US$50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars); (c) Miguel Ángel Díaz Loreto, Dinorah María Díaz Loreto, Jairo Alexis Díaz Loreto, Bladimir Lenin Díaz Loreto and Octavio Antonio Díaz Loreto, US$50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars) each; (d) Arianna Leaneth Díaz Doubain US$25,000 (twenty-five thousand United States dollars), and (e) Alexandra Teresa Gualdrón Pernía, José Ocopio, Luz Marina Ledesma de Díaz, José Rafael Ocopio, US$15,000 (fifteen thousand United States dollars) each.. 165. The compensation established in this chapter in favor of David Octavio Díaz Loreto shall be shared equally among Juana Emilia Loreto Pérez (mother), Miguel Ángel Díaz Loreto (brother), Dinorah María Díaz Loreto (sister), Jairo Alexis Díaz Loreto (brother), Bladimir Lenin Díaz Loreto (brother), Octavio Antonio Díaz Loreto (brother) and Arianna Leaneth Díaz Doubain. In addition, the compensation established in this chapter in favor of Robert Ignacio Díaz Loreto and Octavio Ignacio Díaz Álvarez shall be shared equally among Juana Emilia Loreto Pérez, Miguel Ángel Díaz Loreto, Dinorah María Díaz Loreto, Jairo Alexis Díaz Loreto, Bladimir Lenin Díaz Loreto, Octavio Antonio Díaz Loreto and Arianna Leaneth Díaz Doubain. G. Costs and expenses Cf. Case of Castillo Páez v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of November 27, 1998. Series C No. 43, para. 76, and Case of Tenorio Roca et al. v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of June 22, 2016. Series C No. 314, para. 333. 184 Cf. Case of Neira Alegría et al. v. Peru. Reparations and costs, para. 56. and Case of Ruíz Fuentes et al. v. Guatemala, para. 244. 185 -46-