102 and private hospitals for both patients and medical personnel, and on the website of the Ministry of Health and Social Services. In addition, access to this leaflet or publication should be provided through the Office of the Ombudsman and civil society organizations working in this area. Following implementation, the State must provide an annual report on this measure for three years. 342. Also, taking into account that the violations of I.V.’s autonomy and reproductive freedom were due to negative gender-based stereotypes in the health sector (supra para. 236), a measure of reparation must be ordered to avoid the repetition of facts such as those of this case. To this end, the Court orders the State, within one year, to adopt permanent education and training programs for medical students and professionals, as well as for all personnel who are members of the health and social security system, on issues relating to informed consent, gender-based discrimination and stereotypes, and gender-based violence. E. Other measures requested 343. The Commission asked the Court to order the State to investigate the facts surrounding the sterilization of I.V. without her consent and to establish the appropriate responsibilities and sanctions. The Commission also asked that the State investigate the flaws in the practices of the Judiciary and its auxiliary organs that permit excessive delays in judicial proceedings, and adopt the necessary measures to ensure effective access to justice through due process of law and an expedite and efficient administration of justice. 344. The representative asked the Court to order Bolivia to re-open the criminal proceedings against the medical team responsible for I.V.’s forced sterilization and to investigate, prosecute and sanction, by both disciplinary and criminal proceedings, all the agents of justice, judicial officials, prosecutors, judges and magistrates who acted with a lack of diligence in the criminal proceedings against the authors of the forced sterilization suffered by I.V. 345. The State indicated that it was not appropriate to re-open the extinguished criminal proceedings, because this was impossible de facto and de iure. It also indicated that the administrative disciplinary proceeding underway against the physician was sufficient to ensure I.V.’s access to justice and that the mechanism of the extinction of the criminal action protected the physician because it constitutes a guarantee of due process recognized by the inter-American system. The State considered that the Court had only required that the statute of limitations be declared inadmissible in cases of egregious human rights violations and that the case of I.V. did not constitute a grave violation of human rights. Regarding the prosecution of the agents of justice, the State indicated that I.V. had not filed charges against the judges and judicial officials involved in the proceedings alleging a violation of her rights and judicial guarantees owing to the presumed actions of these officials; therefore, respecting the time frame established for the prescription of the action in disciplinary proceedings, it was not feasible to open an investigation to this end. Similarly, the State indicated that it was working on strengthening the institutional capacity of its organs of justice by the implementation of a series of policies under the Sectoral Plan for Plural Justice (2012-2015). 346. The representative also asked this Court to order the State to name the operating theater in the La Paz Women’s Hospital after the victim. It indicated that this designation should be made in a public act in the presence of the victim, the members of her family and senior representatives of the State, including from the Judiciary. She also asked the Court to order Bolivia to take the following measures of non-repetition: (i) inclusion of this judgment in the curriculum of the deontology course in the Faculties of Medicine and of Law of the country’s public and private universities and in the curriculum for training judges of the State’s School for Judges, and also in the training program for prosecutors of the School of Prosecutors: (ii) adoption of measures to provide training on the rights of women for all public officials involved in the processing of cases of violence against women so that they are able to apply domestic laws and international standards when prosecuting such crimes