2 […] […] in supervising comprehensive compliance with the judgments on the merits and on reparations issued in the instant case, and after analyzing the information supplied by the State, by the victims, and by the Inter-American Commission, the Court […] verif[ied] that the State ha[d] paid the compensations for costs and expenses of the victims before the Court, pursuant to operative paragraph six of the Judgment on reparations. 7. 8. […] after analyzing the information provided by the State, the victims and the InterAmerican Commission, the Tribunal consider[ed] it is essential that the State inform the Court regarding the compliance with the following aspects: a) the outcome of the investigations to identify and punish the responsible for the human rights violations committed against the victims of the instant case […] (Operative paragraph four of the Judgment of November 27, 2003); and b) The payment of the amounts corresponding to the arrears of salaries and other benefits that, in accordance with the domestic law, correspond to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano (Operative Paragraph five of the Judgment of November 27, 2003). In this regard, the Tribunal decided: 3. To urge the State to adopt the measures that are necessary to promptly and effectively comply with the reparations ordered in the Judgment of January 31, 2001 and that are still pending compliance, in accordance with the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 3. The Order of the Court of November 17, 2004 regarding the compliance with the Judgment of the instant case, in which the Court decided: […] 8. [In the process of overseeing comprehensive compliance with the January 31, 2001 Judgment, and after analyzing the documents supplied by the State, by the representatives of the victim and by the Commission in their briefs on compliance with reparations (…), the Court note[d] that it d[id] not have sufficient information on the following points currently pending compliance: the current status of the investigations to identify and punish the persons responsible for the human rights violations committed against the victims in the case (operative paragraph four of the January 31, 2001 Judgment); and b) Payment of the back pay and other benefits due, according to domestic legislation, to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano (operative paragraph five of the January 31, 2001 Judgment). 9. […] This Court […] assert[ed] that the State that is found responsible and is in arrears regarding payment of the compensation ordered by the Court must pay interest on the amount owed. It is an obligation of the State found responsible to pay the compensation ordered by the Court within the term set for this purpose, and non-compliance with this obligation entails consequences for the State. When it pays after the deadline, the State incurs the obligation to pay interest on the amount owed, so as to maintain the value of the compensation and ensure that that said amounts retain their purchasing power. The Court […] declare[d] that the States have said obligation to pay interest even when the judgment in which the Court ordered the reparations did not explicitly state said obligation. […] In this regard, the Tribunal decided: