3 […] 2. To order the State to fix and pay, in accordance with the domestic legislation most favorable to the victims and respecting due process guarantees, the interest due from the time it incurred in arrears regarding payment of the back pay and other benefits of Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano. 3. To ask the State to submit a detailed report, no later than January 31, 2005, on the current status of investigations to identify and punish the persons responsible for the human rights violations committed against the victims in this case –as well as regarding steps taken to pay the back pay, other benefits and interest due, according to domestic legislation, to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano – as set forth in Whereas eight and nine of the […] Order. […] 4. The Order of the Court of February 7, 2006 regarding the compliance with the Judgment of the instant case, in which the Court declared: 1. That the State has complied with the totality of payment of the compensations for the arrears of salary and other benefits that, pursuant to domestic legislation, correspond to Messrs. Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry y Delia Revoredo Marsano de Mur (fifth operative paragraph of the Judgment of January 31, 2001). 2. That it will maintain the procedure of supervision of compliance of the pending matters in the present case open, specifically: a) The investigation to determine the people responsible for the violations of human rights against the victims of the case and their punishment (fourth operative paragraph of the Judgment of January 31, 2001), and b) the determination and payment, pursuant to the most favorable domestic legislation applicable to the victims and observing the guarantees of the due process, of the interests generated during the time in which it incurred in delay regarding the payment of the arrears of salary and other benefits of Messrs. Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry, and Delia Revoredo Marsano (fifth operative paragraph of the Judgment of January 31, 2001 and ruling of Compliance with Judgment of November 17, 2004). In this regard, the Tribunal decided: 1. To urge the State to adopt all the measures necessary to give effect and prompt compliance to the matters pending of compliance that were ordered by the Tribunal in the Judgment of January 31, 2001, as well as that stated in the Rulings of November 27, 2003 and November 17, 2004 (supra Considerations 1 through 3) and the Eighth to Fourteenth Whereas Clauses of the […] Ruling, pursuant to that stipulated in Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request the State to present, no later than May 24, 2006, a detailed report on the status of compliance of the pending matters mentioned.