8 25. That the representatives pointed out that even if it is true that the Judgment was partially published, not all the paragraphs were published on that occasion and they highlighted that the Chapter entitled " the State’s international responsibility in the context of the instant Case” has not been published at all. Moreover, the Commission noted that the State complied with the order regarding the publication in the Official Gazette of the parts of the Judgment, except for such chapter. 26. That the Court values that the State has Publisher some of the parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette on May 11, 2007. Nevertheless, it also considers the statements made by the representatives and the Commission regarding the fact that in said publication, the chapter entitled "the State's international responsibility in the context of the instant case" was not published (paragraphs 62 to 73 of the Judgment). In this way, the Court deems it is essential that the State fully publishes the pertinent parts of the Judgment, according to the order delivered by this Court, including the chapter missing in the publication of May 11, 2007 and proceeds, in turn, to publish the pertinent parts of the Judgment in a newspaper with widespread circulation of Paraguay. * * * 27. That, as to the State’s obligation to provide all the next of kin of Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba and Benjamín Ramírez Villalba with appropriate treatment including medicines, after they have given their corresponding consent, as of notification of the Judgment and for all the time necessary, without any charge and through the national health services (operative paragraph nine of the Judgment), the State did not submit any information on the compliance with that issue. 28. That the representatives emphasized that the State did not inform on the status of compliance with this issue and pointed out that no member of the victims’ next-of-kin would have called upon the representatives of the Inter-Institutional Commission, or would have been offered with assistance. 29. That the Court observes that the State has not informed on this measure of reparation. Moreover, it takes into account the statement made by the representatives in the sense that no member of the victims' next-of-kin has received any kind of treatment or has had the opportunity of requesting it as from notice of the Judgment. The Court considers it is of utmost importance that this measure of reparation begins to be fully and effectively implemented. * * * 30. That as to the obligation of the State to erect, within one year, a monument in memory of Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba and Benjamín Ramírez Villalba (operative paragraph ten of the Judgment), the State mentioned that it remembered that, together with the pertinent consultations and steps taken by the representative of the Municipality of Asunción in relation to the identification of the places and their feasibility, the legal representative of the victims’ next-of-kin will discuss with them this issue in order to