9 reach an agreement. Up to the moment of the submission of the State’s report, the result of said consultations are still pending. 31. That the representatives pointed out that they are unaware of the proposal made by the State as well as of the consultation the State mentioned it held with the legal representative of the victims. The representatives considered that the monument is not going to be erected in memory of Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba and Benjamín Ramírez Villalba but that “they expect that it will be a reference of the context of the forced disappearance of people that occurred during the Condor Operation", meaning that, said monument "will be in memory of those that were victims of forced disappearances during the dictatorship". 32. That the Court values the will expressed by the State regarding this issue, but it observes that the State is delayed for compliance with this issue, specifically because the term fixed in the Judgment to erect the monument was of one year as from notice of said judgment. It is necessary to recall that the future monument must bear a plaque with the names of these victims and should mention the context of the forced disappearances that occurred during Condor Operation. The Tribunal recalls the importance for the State to comply with this measure of reparation, given the real symbolic value that the same has as a guarantee of non-repetition of such serious facts in the future. * * * 33. That as to the obligation of the State to implement, within a reasonable time, must implement, within a reasonable time, permanent programs of human rights training in the Paraguayan police forces, at all levels (operative paragraph eleven of the Judgment), the State informed that the National Police was already implementing programs on Human Rights, Ethic of the Human Person and Police Practice and Procedure. 34. That the representatives stated that they have no further information than the information provided by the State and the Commission considered that the information submitted by the State does not allow to properly value whether this obligation is being complied with. 35. That the Court values the fact that the education programs on human rights are already being enforced within the Paraguayan police forces. Moreover, the Court reminds the State that the education on human rights within the Armed Forces is vital to create guarantees of non-repetition of facts as the ones seen in the instant case. Therefore, it urges the State authorities to continue adopting the measures necessary to fully comply with this obligation and it is waiting for further information on the results of such measures. * * * 36. That as the State's obligation to adapt, within a reasonable time, the definition of the crimes of torture and “involuntary” (forzosa) disappearance of persons contained in Articles 236 and 309 of the current Penal Code to the applicable