May 12 and 14, 2008, the State referred to the death of Walter Mansilla. In the briefs of April 13, May 2, and June 10, 2011, it provided information on the death of Juan Pablo Caba (infra Having Seen 3 and 5). In addition, through the aforementioned briefs of March 11 and November 26, 2009, as well as the briefs of September 21, 2009, and April 12, 2010, the State asked that the measures be lifted. Also, through the briefs of February 1, 2010 and February 7, 2011, the State submitted its observations on the requests for expansion of the provisional measures filed by the representatives (infra Having Seen 3). In the February 1, 2010, brief, the State also made reference to the death of Mr. Juan Pablo Caba (infra Having Seen 3 and 5). 3. The representatives’ briefs of July 1 and 4 and October 29, 2008; January 22 and April 21, 2009, and January 2, 2010, whereby they presented their comments on the reports submitted by the State (supra Having Seen 2). Through the aforementioned briefs of October 29, 2008; January 22 and April 21, 2009; and January 2, 2010, the representatives requested the creation of an “Executive Work Team”, and in the brief of January 2, 2010, they requested the broadening of the instant provisional measures. In addition, in the representatives’ communications of March 25, April 15 and October 20, 2008; August 24, 2009; January 14, March 9, April 13, June 17, July 2, and November 12 and 23, 2010; and February 18, April 7 and 15, May 7, and August 11 and 21, 2011, they submitted additional information to the Court regarding these provisional measures. Also, in the communications of February 18 and April 7, 2011, the representatives informed the Court of their representation of the beneficiaries of these measures. In a second communication dated April 7, 2011, the representatives reported the death of Juan Pablo Caba (supra Having Seen 2 and infra Having Seen 5). In addition, in the aforementioned communications of March 9 and November 12, 2010, and February 18, April 15 and August 11, 2011, the representatives requested the broadening of these provisional measures. Also, in the communications dated July 16, 2008 and April 17 and 27, 2009, the representatives requested that a hearing be held on the implementation of the instant measures. 4. The briefs of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) of April 1, August 26 and November 24, 2008; May 26, 2009; January 15 and December 3, 2010, and May 27 and August 25, 2011, whereby the representatives presented their observations on the information submitted by the State and the representatives (supra Having Seen 2 and 3). Through the briefs of May 26, 2009, and January 15, 2010, the Commission addressed the State’s request to lift the provisional measures (supra Having Seen 2), while in the latter brief and the brief dated December 3, 2010, it addressed to the requests for broadening of measures made by the representatives (supra Having Seen 3). The note from the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of 5. April 23, 2008, whereby it asked the State to submit a report including, inter alia, an assessment of the risk situation of each of the beneficiaries of these measures, specifying the actions implemented pursuant to with these situations of risk, as well as an accurate description of the facts and circumstances leading to the death of Walter Mansilla (supra Having Seen 1). In addition, the Secretariat’s notes of March 18 and 29, 2011, whereby they asked the representatives to submit updated information regarding each of the beneficiaries “as relating to the instant provisional measures.” In this last note it also communicated that the representatives had in the context of the case of Torres Millacura et al. v. Argentina submitted information on the death of Mr. Juan Pablo Caba, beneficiary of the instant provisional measures. It asked the State to 2