33 thereof, to the detriment of Nelly Valle Jaramillo and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa. E) Violation of the right to personal integrity (Article 5(1) of the Convention) of other alleged victims E.1) Other persons acknowledged by the State as victims of the violation of Article 5(1) of the Convention 111. As mentioned above (supra para. 38), the State acquiesced to the claim of the Commission and the representatives that the following family members of Jesús María, Nelly Valle Jaramillo, and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa should be declared victims of the violation of the right to personal integrity: With regard to Jesús María Valle Jaramillo: María Leticia Valle Jaramillo (sister), Ligia Valle Jaramillo (sister), Luzmila Valle Jaramillo (sister), Magdalena Valle Jaramillo (sister), Romelia Valle Jaramillo (sister), Marina Valle Jaramillo (sister, deceased) (and as beneficiaries Mauricio Alberto Herrera Valle, Claudia Helena Herrera Valle and Liliana María Herrera Valle), Darío Valle Jaramillo (brother) and Octavio Valle Jaramillo (brother) (and as beneficiaries Juan Guillermo Valle Noreña, John Jairo Valle Noreña, Berta Lucía Valle Noreña, and Luz Adriana Valle Noreña); With regard to Nelly Valle Jaramillo: Alfonso Montoya Restrepo (husband) and Luis Fernando Montoya Valle (son); With regard to Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa: Gloria Lucía Correa (wife), Carlos Enrique Jaramillo Correa (son), María Lucía Jaramillo Correa (daughter), Ana Carolina Jaramillo Correa (daughter), Jesús Emilio Jaramillo Barrera (father), Adela Correa de Jaramillo (mother), Blanca Lucía Jaramillo Correa (sister), Romelia Jaramillo Correa (sister), Nellyda Jaramillo Correa (sister), José María Jaramillo Correa (brother) (and as beneficiaries Juliana Jaramillo Tobón and Santiago Jaramillo Tobón), Luis Eugenio Jaramillo Correa (brother), Gloria Elena Jaramillo Correa (sister), and Adriana María Jaramillo Correa (sister). 112. In relation to the violation of the personal integrity of the next of kin of Jesús María Valle Jaramillo, in addition to the State’s acquiescence, it can be concluded from the body of evidence, according to the statement made before the Court by Nelly Valle Jaramillo, that “ever since [Jesús María Valle Jaramillo] died, ever since he was killed […], they have always been afraid […], their apprehensions persisted, [as well as their] fear of leaving the house.” When questioned about the consequences of the events in relation to the safety of her family, she referred to her son, who had commented that “he was very afraid that someone would place a bomb or do something to him.”73 113. In relation to Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa and his family, according to the testimony of Saúl Jaramillo Giraldo, a friend of Mr. Jaramillo Correa: The emotional impact [caused by the forced displacement] broke up the family, which had been a united family that worked together. For the same reason, they had to go in different directions, abandoning their property, and Don Jesús Emilio, who was very attached to his home town, La Granja, had to live out his last days in Medellín and die there, displaced. [Jaramillo Giraldo also told of how,] on one occasion, he and Carlos Fernando visited the latter’s father, who lived in the Laureles district, and [of how he] was surprised because [Don Jesús Emilio] cried as he welcomed them, recalling old times and their shared experiences in Ituango. [He also said that Carlos Fernando Jaramillo told him that, as a refugee, he felt] safe, but not […] content, or happy as he was [when] he lived in La Granja [a place he remembers] every day.74 114. Also, according to the statement of María Amanda Correa Zuleta: 73 Testimony given by the witness, Nelly Valle Jaramillo, during the public hearing held at the seat of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on February 6 and 7, 2008. 74 Statement made before notary public by the witness, Saúl Jaramillo Giraldo, on January 8, 2008 (file of affidavits and the respective observations, folio 2229).