96. It must also be taken into account that human rights are interdependent and indivisible, which is why the hypothesis that ESCERs are beyond the jurisdictional control of this Court is inadmissible.107 97. The Court has maintained that the right to work is protected under Article 26 of the Convention.108 It has cautioned that Articles 45(b) and (c),109 46110 and 34(g)111 of the OAS Charter set out provisions that point to the right to work. More specifically, the Court has noted that Article 45(b) of the OAS Charter provides that work is “a right and a social duty, it gives dignity to the one who performs it, and it should be performed under conditions, including a system of fair wages, that ensure life, health, and a decent standard of living for the worker and his family, both during his working years and in his old age, or when any circumstance deprives him of the possibility of working.” The Court has thus found that the reference to the right to work is sufficiently specific to infer that it is present and recognized in the OAS Charter. 98. The Court, in considering the content and scope of this right, recalls that Article XIV of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man states, “[e]very person has the right to work, under proper conditions, and to follow his vocation freely […].” Article 6 of the Protocol of San Salvador states, “[e]veryone has the right to work, which includes the opportunity to secure the means for living a dignified and decent existence by performing a freely elected or accepted lawful activity.” The same concept appears in the world system, Cf. Case of Guevara Díaz v. Costa Rica. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of June 22, 2022. Series C No. 453, para. 57. 107 Cf. Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru, supra, paras. 142 and 145, Case of Dismissed Employees of Petroperú et al. v. Peru, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment of November 23, 2017, Series C No. 344, para. 192; Case of San Miguel Sosa et al. v. Venezuela, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment of February 8, 2018, Series C No. 348, para. 220; Case of Casa Nina v. Peru, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment of November 24, 2020, Series C No. 419, paras. 103-110; Case of Palacio Urrutia et al. v. Ecuador. Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment of November 24, 2021, Series C No. 446, paras. 153-160; Case of the National Federation of Maritime and Port Workers (FEMAPOR) v. Peru, Preliminary Objections, Merits and Reparations, Judgment of February 1, 2022; Series C No. 448, paras. 107- 111; Case of Pavez Pavez vs. Chile, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment of February 4, 2022; Series C No. 449, paras. 88-90; Case of Guevara Díaz v. Costa Rica, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment of June 22, 2022; Series C No. 453, paras. 55-74; Case of the Former Employees of the Judiciary v. Guatemala, Preliminary Objections, Merits and Reparations, Judgment of November 17, 2021; Series C No. 445, paras. 128-133, and Case of Nissen Pessolani v. Paraguay, supra, para. 101. 108 Article 45 of the OAS Charter. The Member States, convinced that man can only achieve the full realization of his aspirations within a just social order, along with economic development and true peace, agree to dedicate every effort to the application of the following principles and mechanisms: […] (b) Work is a right and a social duty, it gives dignity to the one who performs it, and it should be performed under conditions, including a system of fair wages, that ensure life, health, and a decent standard of living for the worker and his family, both during his working years and in his old age, or when any circumstance deprives him of the possibility of working; (c) Employers and workers, both rural and urban, have the right to associate themselves freely for the defense and promotion of their interests, including the right to collective bargaining and the workers' right to strike, and recognition of the juridical personality of associations and the protection of their freedom and independence, all in accordance with applicable laws […]. 109 Article 46 of the OAS Charter. The Member States recognize that, in order to facilitate the process of Latin American regional integration, it is necessary to harmonize the social legislation of the developing countries, especially in the labor and social security fields, so that the rights of the workers shall be equally protected, and they agree to make the greatest efforts possible to achieve this goal. 110 Article 34 of the OAS Charter. The Member States agree that equality of opportunity, the elimination of extreme poverty, equitable distribution of wealth and income and the full participation of their peoples in decisions relating to their own development are, among others, basic objectives of integral development. To achieve them, they likewise agree to devote their utmost efforts to accomplishing the following basic goals: […] g) Fair wages, employment opportunities, and acceptable working conditions for all. 111 31