facts in a timely manner before the Criminal Investigation Judge, who is precisely the authority responsible for the oversight of such guarantees. Since that did not occur and given that the said official decided on his own authority to order the defendants to be placed in pre-trial detention, any such supposed anomalies have been regularized. Therefore, at this stage of the proceedings, the defendants’ claims that they are being detained unlawfully are without any legal grounds.124 96. However, taking into account that, during the trial, it had been reported that violations of the defendants’ human rights had been committed by public officials, the court ordered that the case file be forwarded to the Public Prosecution Service for investigation.125 This Court has no evidence proving that the file was, in fact, forwarded126 97. Those convicted filed an appeal, reiterating the alleged violations of their human rights during the detention and investigation.127 On August 21, 2003, the First Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice declared the appeal inadmissible without ruling on the allegations of human rights violations.128 The convicted persons then filed a remedy of cassation129 and this was declared inadmissible by the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice on October 29, 2003.130 C.2. Execution of the sentences 98. Claudia Mariela Valencia Alarcón was released from prison on February 6, 2002, with a release order. On May 10, 2008, a final release order was issued for F.E.P.M. On October 7, 2010, a conditional release order was issued in favor of Mercedes Valencia Chuquimia. Raúl Oswaldo Lulleman Gutiérrez left prison following a release order in the form of house arrest on May 18, 2009; however, it was recorded that he entered the Patacmaya Custodial Center on August 9, 2016, owing to the perpetration of another offense. On December 1, 2010, a conditional release order was issued for Oswaldo Lulleman Antezana,131 who died on July 5, 2011.132 Then, on August 30, 2013, a conditional release order was issued for Norma Lupe Alarcón Castillo. On February 124 Judgment No. 12/2003 delivered by the El Alto Second Sentencing Court at 6 p.m. on May 16, 2003 (evidence file, folios 1910 to 1911). Cf. Judgment No. 12/2003 delivered by the El Alto Second Sentencing Court at 6 p.m. on May 16, 2003 (evidence file, folio 1920). 125 With a report of March 3, 2010, the Secretariat of the First Criminal Chamber Primera sent a letter to the president of the superior district court in which he indicated that no criminal proceedings existed in which any of the 26 alleged victims in this case appeared as victims (evidence file, folio 12825). 126 Cf. Appeals filed by: F.E.P.M. on June 2, 2003; and individually, on June 9, 2003, by Alfredo Bazán y Rosas; Blas Valencia Campos; Mercedes Valencia Chuquimia; Norma Lupe Alarcón Castillo de Valencia; Carlos Eladio Cruz Añez; Patricia Catalina Gallardo Ardúz; Víctor Manuel Boggiano Bruzzón; Elacio Peña Córdova; Carlos Enrique Castro Ramírez; Oswaldo Lullean Antezana, and Raúl Lulleman Gutiérrez (evidence file, folios 850 to 986) 127 128 Cf. Resolution No. 539/03 issued by the First Criminal Chamber on August 21, 2003 (evidence file, folios 3442 to 3445). 129 Cf. Cassation appeals filed by: Carlos Eladio Cruz Añez on September 12, 2003, and, individually, on September 13 by Alfredo Bazán y Rosas; Blas Valencia Campos; Patricia Catalina Gallardo; Norma Lupe Alarcón Castillo de Valencia; Mercedes Valencia Chuquimia; Víctor Manuel Boggiano Bruzzón; Oswaldo Lulleman Antezana and Raúl Lulleman Gutiérrez; F.E.P.M.; Carlos Enrique Castro Ramírez, and Elacio Peña Córdova (evidence file, folios 613 to 698). Cf. Supreme order No. 541 issued by the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice on October 29, 2003 (evidence file folios, 3527 and 3528). 130 131 Cf. Table prepared by the State based on information provided by the Prison Regime General Directorate attached to the Ministry of the Interior (evidence file, folios 7570 to 7572). 132 case. Cf. Death certificate No. 011137 (merits file, folio 80.4). Mr. Lulleman’s death was unrelated to the facts of this 30