61. The representatives asked that the judgment be published in a newspaper of national circulation within six months of its notification and on a publicly-accessible website. 62. The State indicated that the judicial decisions obtained by Mr. Boleso already recognized that he was right and entitled, and that the Court's judgment would be a sufficient form of satisfaction. 63. As it has done in other cases, 58 the Court decides that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this judgment, in an appropriate and legible font: a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette; b) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a media outlet with widespread national circulation, in a font size that is adequate and legible and c) this judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on the official websites of the Ministry for Foreign and Religious Affairs and International Trade of Argentina and of the Government of the Province of Corrientes. Also, within six months of notification of the Judgment, d) the State shall publicize the Court's Judgment on the social media accounts of the Ministry of Foreign and Religious Affairs and International Trade of Argentina and of the Government of the Province of Corrientes. The posts must indicate that the Inter-American Court has issued judgment in this case declaring the State internationally responsible and providing a link giving direct access to the full text. Each institution must post this at least five times during business hours, and the posts must remain published on their social media profiles. The State must inform this Court immediately when it has made each of the publications ordered, irrespective of the one-year timeframe for presenting its first report, as established in the eighth operative paragraph of this judgment. C. Other measures requested 64. The Commission asked that administrative or other measures be adopted to ensure that judicial proceedings directly related to the remuneration of judges “be resolved in a timely manner and within a reasonable period of time, taking into account independence they require to exercise their duties.” 65. The representatives asked that the State provide psychological medical assistance to Mr. Héctor Hugo Boleso, due to the emotional suffering resulting from the anguish, anxiety, and distress suffered. They also asked for a public apology to be made to Mr. Boleso. They additionally requested that officials of the Judiciary and the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Province of Corrientes, as well as lawyers of the province, be trained on the State’s international commitments, especially in the area of access to justice within a reasonable period of time. 66. Addressing the Commission's request, the State indicated that the processes brought by judges “are not the only ones that must be resolved as a priority within a reasonable period of time,” especially considering that a judge’s salary “is not the most vulnerable.” It added that "not every process involving judicial remuneration is a concern from the standpoint of judicial independence." 67. The Court finds that the delivery of this judgment and the reparations ordered in this chapter are sufficient and adequate to redress the violations suffered by the victim and does 58 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Merits, Reparations, and Costs, supra, para. 79; and Case of Olivera Fuentes v. Peru, supra, para. 145. 16