3 subparagraphs a), b), c), d) and e) of the […] Order. […] 4. The briefs of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (hereinafter “the State” or “Venezuela”) of May 6 and December 5, 2005, and of June 4 and September 16, 2008, whereby it forwarded information on monitoring compliance with the Judgment. 5. The briefs of the victims’ representatives (hereinafter “the representatives”) of June 6, 2005; January 26, 2006; and July 25 and November 3, 2008; whereby they forwarded their observations on monitoring compliance with the Judgment. 6. The briefs of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) of June 21, 2005; February 20, 2006; and August 1 and December 31, 2008; whereby it forwarded its observations on monitoring compliance with the Judgment. 7. The notes of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of July 19, 2005 and November 5, 2006, whereby it requested the State, inter alia, to submit detailed information on the steps taken in order to comply with the measures pending fulfillment, to wit: i) the progress made as regards the investigation, identification and punishment, if applicable, of those responsible for the facts, ii) the location, exhumation and identification of the mortal remains of some of the victims, and iii) the obligation to take the necessary steps to avoid the repetition of the facts and circumstances of the instant case by training and educating the members of the Armed Forces and security agencies in human rights, the adjustment of operational plans designed to deal with public disturbances to the requirements of respect for human rights and to guarantee that physical means will only be only used where they are strictly necessary to control such situations, with respect for the right to life and humane treatment. 8. The communication of the Secretariat of August 5, 2008, whereby it requested the representatives to clarify its position to the Court regarding the payment due by the State as reimbursement for costs and expenses, since by means of the brief of June 6, 2005, the representatives pointed out that the State had made the payment due to the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) through a bank transfer and later, in their brief of July 25, 2008 they stated that compliance had been partial and that the payment had been made to Comité de Familiares de las Víctimas de los Sucesos de Febrero-Marzo de 1989 [COFAVIC]. 9. The brief of the Secretariat of September 25, 2008, whereby it requested the State to submit detailed and accurate information on the steps taken in compliance with operative paragraph 4, subparagraphs a), b) and c) of the Judgment rendered on August 29, 2002 (supra Having Seen clause 2), as it had made no reference thereto. Furthermore, it requested the representatives and the Commission to submit detailed information on each measure pending compliance, in accordance with the provisions of Considering clause 9 and operative paragraph 2 of the Order of the Court of November 17, 2004 (supra Having Seen clause 3). 10. The Order of the President of the Court of May 20, 2009, whereby she summoned the State, the representatives and the Inter-American Commission to a private hearing to be held on July 4, 2009, in relation to monitoring compliance with the Judgment rendered on August 29, 2002 in the case of the Caracazo.