2 fourteen homicide victims and disappeared persons whose mortal remains have not been delivered to their next of kin, an amount that will augment the sum stated in the foregoing subparagraph (operative paragraph 8(e)); compensation for non-pecuniary damages pertaining to the violation of the rights to a fair trial, due process and access to effective recourse of the next of kin of the thirty-seven homicide victims and disappeared persons (operative paragraph 8(f)); compensation for non-pecuniary damages pertaining to the violation of the rights to a fair trial, due process and access to effective recourse of the next of kin of the four persons who lost their lives within the context of the facts of the instant case, but whose death was not attributed to the State in the Judgment on the merits as there was no acknowledgement of responsibility for them by the State (operative paragraph 8(g)); and compensation for the non-pecuniary damages pertaining to the violation of the rights to a fair trial, due process and access to effective recourse of the three victims of the violation of the right to humane treatment (operative paragraph 8(h)); d) the procedures ordered by the Court to pay the amounts set as compensation in operative paragraph 8 (operative paragraph 9); e) payment to the Comité de Familiares de las Víctimas de los Sucesos de FebreroMarzo de 1989 [COFAVIC] of the amount set as reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred in proceedings under the domestic jurisdiction and before the Inter-American system and to cover expenses to be incurred in future proceedings pertaining to compliance with the […] Judgment (operative paragraph 10), and f) publication, within a reasonable period, in the Official Gazette and in a widely read national daily of Chapter I, Introduction of the Case, paragraph 1, subparagraphs a), b), c), d), e), f) and (a) and the operative points included in Chapter VII of the Judgment on the merits and paragraphs 66 to 66(16) of the Judgment on reparations (operative paragraph 5). 9. […T]he Court not[ed] that it did not hav[e] sufficient information on the following points pending compliance: a) the steps taken in connection with the investigation, identification and administrative and criminal punishment of those responsible for the facts, under the terms set forth in the Judgment (operative paragraph 1); b) the steps taken in order to find, exhume, identify and deliver to their next of kin the mortal remains of some of the victims (operative paragraph 2); c) had some of the victims been exhumed, whether the State has paid for the costs of burial of the mortal remains of the persons referred to in operative paragraph two, in the place chosen by their next of kin (operative paragraph 3); d) the adoption of the necessary steps to avoid repetition of the facts and circumstances of the instant case (operative paragraph 4, subparagraphs a), b) and c), and e) payment of costs and expenses in favor of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) (operative paragraph 10). 10. […T]he Court will conside[r] the general progress in compliance with its Judgment on reparations, as well as with this Order, once it has receiv[ed] the relevant information on the measures pending compliance [, and declared that:] 1. […] the State has complied with payment of the amounts set as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages (operative paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Judgment on reparations delivered by this Court on August 29, 2002); payment of costs and expenses in favor of the Comité de Familiares de las Víctimas de los Sucesos de Febrero-Marzo de 1989 [COFAVIC] (operative paragraph 10 of the Judgment on reparations rendered by this Court on August 29, 2002), and with the publication of the parts of the Judgments on the merits and on reparations rendered in the instant case (operative paragraph 5 of the Judgment on reparations rendered by this Court on August 29, 2002) […]. 2. […] it will keep open the proceedings for monitoring compliance with the measures pending fulfillment in the instant case, as specified in Considering clause 9,