freedom of thought and freedom of expression, in the terms of paragraphs 254 and 255 of the judgment (thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment); b) To harmonize, within a reasonable time, domestic laws to international standards on the military jurisdiction so that, if the existence of a military criminal jurisdiction is considered necessary, it must be limited solely to hearing offenses committed in the course of duty by members of the military in active service. Thus, the State must enact legislation to place limits on the personal and material competence of the military courts so that, under no circumstance, may civilians be subject to the jurisdiction of the military criminal courts, in the terms of paragraphs 256 and 257 of the judgment (fourteenth operative paragraph of the judgment); and, c) To guarantee due process in the military criminal jurisdiction and judicial protection regarding the actions of the military authorities, in the terms of paragraph 257 of the judgment (fifteenth operative paragraph of the judgment). AND DECIDES: 1. To reiterate to the State that it must adopt all necessary measures to comply effectively and promptly with the pending aspects ordered by the Court in the judgment on merits, reparations and costs of November 22, 2005, and in the present order, in accordance with the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request the State to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights by October 15, 2011, at the latest, a report indicating the measures taken to comply with the measures of reparation ordered by this Court that remain pending, in accordance with the first declarative paragraph of this order. 3. To request the representatives of the victims and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit any observations they deem pertinent on the State’s report mentioned in the preceding operative paragraph, within two and four weeks, respectively, of receiving it. 4. To request the representatives of the victim to forward recent information on the payments ordered in favor of Anne Ellen Steward Orlandini, in accordance with the provisions of the twenty-fourth considering paragraph of this order, within the time frame indicated in the preceding operative paragraph. 5. To continue monitoring compliance with the judgment on merits, reparations, and costs of November 22, 2005. 6. To require the Secretariat of the Court to notify this order to the Republic of Chile, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the representatives of the victim. 10