6 * * * 8. That regarding the payment of interest accrued in arrears in the name of Mrs. Ana Vitelma Ortiz, the State reported that in 2006, it transferred the amount owed to the account of her representatives, the Colombian Commission of Jurists, and requested that this obligation be considered complied with. 9. That the representatives confirmed the transfer made by the State and in the hearing for monitoring of compliance reported that after various attempts to contact the beneficiary, they were able to transfer said payment to the beneficiary’s bank account. They reported that the obligation is satisfied. 10. That the Inter-American Commission finds that the State has made the payment and requests that the Court consider this operative paragraph complied with. * * * 11. That regarding the reparation ordered to Ingrid Carolina Caballero Martínez, the State requested that Court consider this obligation to be complied with, in light of the transfer made in 2006 to the savings account of the beneficiary (supra Having Seen, paragraph 3.b). 12. That the representatives indicated that they could not confirm this information because they do not represent said person. 13. That the Commission appreciated the action taken by the State; that notwithstanding, in the hearing for monitoring of compliance, it indicated that the amount that had been transferred to said beneficiary could be less than what it should have been under the Judgment on reparations and costs. Consequently, the Commission deemed it necessary for the State to clarify this situation and submit information in this regard. 14. That in accordance with what the State has reported and the documentation it has presented, it is noted that Colombia made efforts toward complying with this obligation. In essence, the Tribunal observes that the State ordered the banking institution to make a transfer of 50% of the Certificate of Deposit to the savings account of Ingrid Carolina Caballero Martínez because said person had reached the age of consent. The Court considers the State’s actions on this aspect of the Sentence to be positive. However, in evaluating compliance with this measure of reparations, the Tribunal deems it necessary for the State to detail the total amount transferred to said beneficiary in its next report, informing the Inter-American Commission on this aspect as well (supra Considering paragraph 13). Likewise, paragraph; ICHR. Case of Palamara Iribarne v. Chile. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, November 30, 2007, seventh Considering paragraph.