44 150. Similarly, Bismarck Albán-Sánchez, Miss Albán-Cornejo’s father, in his affidavit, expressed that “many facts have [made him] lose faith in the administration of justice”. He added that “[i]t is very frustrating to see the outcomes after such a long time and realize that those who are guilty have not been punished and that, despite all [their] efforts, nothing has happened”. Finally, when referring to the situation of Dr. Espinoza-Cuesta, Mr. Albán-Sánchez expressed that “[i]t was [our] representatives who, through an Internet search, located Dr. Espinoza[Cuesta], […] but the State never did anything to locate him”. 151. As regards pecuniary damage, the Court notes that elements to conclude that Laura Albán’s next of kin incurred connection with the steps taken with a view to clearing up daughter’s death. It is the Court’s holding that such pecuniary causal link to the facts of the instant case. there are sufficient various expenses in the causes of their expenditures have a 152. Because a violation of the rights enshrined in the Convention to the detriment of Carmen Cornejo de Albán and Bismarck Albán-Sánchez, Laura Albán’s parents, has been established in this Judgment, as they were declared the victims of the violation of Articles 5(1), 8(1) and 25(1) of the Convention (supra paras. 50 and 109), it is the Court view that compensation for such violation is in order. 153. In view of the foregoing, the Court orders, in equity, the amount of US$25,000 (twenty five thousand US dollars) to be paid to each of the victims, Carmen Cornejo de Albán and Bismarck Albán-Sánchez, as compensation for pecuniary and non pecuniary damages. Said amount shall be given to each of them. 154. The State shall pay the compensation directly to its beneficiaries within one year following notification of the instant Judgment. C) SATISFACTION AND GUARANTEES OF NON-REPETITION 155. Under this heading, the Tribunal shall set the non-pecuniary measures of satisfaction aimed at redressing non pecuniary damages, as well as those measures of public scope or impact. a) Publication of the judgment 156. The representatives requested that the facts and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment be published in the three newspapers of widest circulation in Ecuador, and that the whole Judgment be published in the State’s Official Gazette.