iii. That the State has complied with the execution of the final decision of the Supreme Court of February 12, 1992 in all its terms and, therefore, there is not in the present controversy an alleged failure to comply with the domestic decisions in this controversy that would result in a violation of the right to property, recognized in Article 21 of the Convention. B. Considerations of the Court b.1 Right to work 107. The Court notes that the delay -in the case of all the victims- and/or the failure to execute the decision of February 12 -in the case of the sub-group of 2,309 workers- has had a direct impact on receiving their duly earned, and not paid, wages, which, in turn, affected their right to work. In Lagos del Campo v. Peru the Court developed and substantiated that labor rights were protected by Article 26 of the Convention. It is for the Court to continue to define the scope of the right to work and, particularly, the right to receive wages according to the international corpus iuris in the matter. The Court recalls that the obligations set forth in Articles 1(1) and 2 of the Convention constitute, definitively, the basis to determine the international responsibility of a State for violations of the rights eatablished in the Convention, 121 including those recognized by Article 26. However, the same Convention expressly refers to the standards of general international law for its interpretation and application, specifically through Article 29, which establishes the principle of pro persona. 122 Thus, as has been the consistent practice of the Court, 123 in determining the compatibility of the acts and omissions of the State or of its norms with the Convention or other treaties with respect to which it has competence, the Court may interpret the obligations and rights contained therein in light of other relevant treaties and norms. 124 108. In view of the foregoing, the Court notes that the terms of the right to work are those rights that are derived from the economic and social norms and, especially, the educational, scientific and cultural norms contained in the OAS Charter. 125 Articles. 45(b) 126 and 34(g) 127 of the Charter Cf. Case of the “Mapiripán" Massacre v. Colombia. Judgment of September 15, 2005. Series C No. 134, para. 107 and Case of Vera Rojas et al. v. Chile, supra, para. 34. 122 Cf. Case of the Pacheco Tineo Family v. Bolivia. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 25, 2013. Series C No. 272, para. 143 and Case of Vera Rojas et al. v. Chile, supra, para. 34. 123 Cf. Case of Gelman v. Uruguay. Merits and Reparations. Judgment of February 24, 2011. Series C No. 221, paras. 78 and 121; Case of Atala Riffo and daughters v. Chile. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 24, 2012. Series C No. 239, para. 83; Case of the Pacheco Tineo family v. Bolivia. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 25, 2013. Series C No. 272, para. 129; Case of I.V. v. Bolivia. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2016. Series C No. 329, para. 168; Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of August 31, 2017. Series C No. 340, para. 145; Case of Poblete Vilches et al. v. Chile. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of March 8, 2018. Series C No. 349, para. 103 and Case of Vera Rojas et al. v. Chile, supra, para. 34. 124 Cf. Case of Vera Rojas et al. v. Chile, supra, para. 34. 125 Cf. Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru, supra, para. 143 and Case of the Former Employees of the Judiciary v. Guatemala, supra, para. 128. 126 Cf. Article 45 of the OAS Charter. - The Member States, convinced that man can only achieve the full realization of his aspirations within a just social order, along with economic development and true peace, agree to dedicate every effort to the application of the following principles and mechanisms: […] (b) Work is a right and a social duty, it gives dignity to the one who performs it, and it should be performed under conditions, including a system of fair wages, that ensure life, health, and a decent standard of living for the worker and his family, both during his working years and in his old age, or when any circumstance deprives him of the possibility of working; […]. 127 Cf. Article 34 of the OAS Charter. - The Member States agree that equality of opportunity, the elimination of extreme poverty, equitable distribution of wealth and income and the full participation of their peoples in decisions relating to their own development are, among others, basic objectives of integral development. To achieve them, they likewise agree to devote their utmost efforts to accomplishing the following basic goals:(g) Fair wages, employment opportunities and acceptable working conditions for all. 121 29