69 3. The State violated the right to freedom of association recognized in Article 16 of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Arlei José Escher, Dalton Luciano de Vargas, Delfino José Becker, Pedro Alves Cabral and Celso Aghinoni, owing to the infringement of the exercise of this right, in the terms of paragraphs 169 to 180 of this judgment. 4. The Court does not possess any evidence to prove the existence of a violation of the rights embodied in Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention in relation to the mandado de segurança and to the civil actions examined in this case, in the terms paragraphs 199 and 211 to 213 of this judgment. However, the State violated the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection recognized in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Arlei José Escher, Dalton Luciano de Vargas, Delfino José Becker, Pedro Alves Cabral and Celso Aghinoni, in relation to the criminal action filed against the former Secretary of Security, in the terms of paragraphs 200 to 204 of this judgment; the failure to investigate those responsible for the first dissemination of the telephone conversations, in the terms of paragraph 205 of this judgment, and the lack of grounds for the decision in the administrative court in relation to the functional conduct of the judge who authorized the telephone interception, in the terms of paragraphs 207 to 209 of this judgment. 5. The State did not fail to comply with the Federal Clause established in Article 28 of the American Convention, in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, to the detriment of Arlei José Escher, Dalton Luciano de Vargas, Delfino José Becker, Pedro Alves Cabral and Celso Aghinoni, in the terms of paragraphs 218 to 220 of this judgment. AND DECIDES, unanimously that: 6. This judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 7. The State must pay Arlei José Escher, Dalton Luciano de Vargas, Delfino José Becker, Pedro Alves Cabral and Celso Aghinoni, the amount established in paragraph 235 of this judgment for non-pecuniary damage, within one year of notification hereof and as stipulated in paragraphs 260 to 264 of this judgment. 8. The State must publish once in the official gazette, in another national newspaper with widespread circulation, and in a newspaper with widespread circulation in the state de Paraná, the cover page, Chapters I, VI to XI, without the corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs of this judgment, and must publish the entire text of this judgment on an official web page of the Federal State and of the state of Paraná. The publications in the newspapers and on the Internet must be made within six and twelve months, respectively, of notification of this judgment, in the terms of paragraph 239 hereof. 9. The State must investigate the facts that gave rise to the violations in the instant case, in the terms of paragraph 247 of this judgment. 10. The State must pay the amount established in paragraph 259 of this judgment in reimbursement of costs and expenses, within one year of notification hereof and as stipulated in paragraphs 260 to 264 of this judgment.