2 family, within one year, the compensation for non pecuniary damage established in paragraph 191 of [the] Judgment, as set forth in paragraphs 191, 192, 210, 211 and 213 to 216 [t]hereof[;] 15. […] pay, within one year, the costs and expenses incurred in domestic courts and in the international proceedings carried out within the Inter-American System for Human Rights Protection, pursuant to the amount established in paragraph 209 of [the] Judgment. Said amount must be delivered to Mr. Crispín Baldeón-Yllaconza, as set forth in paragraphs 209, 210 and 212 to 216 thereof. […] 2. The Order of the Inter-American Court of February 7, 2008 on the monitoring compliance with the Judgment, by which it was declared that: [p]ursuant to the information contained in Considering paragraphs 1 and 11 of [said] 1. Order, the State has not complied with its obligation to inform the Court of the measures adopted to abide by the orders of this Tribunal in the operative paragraphs of the Judgment [and] 2. it will keep the procedure for the monitoring of compliance open on all reparation measures ordered by this Court in said Judgment. AND DECIDE[D]: 1. To require the State to adopt all necessary measures to fully and promptly comply with that ordered by the Court in the Judgment [...] in keeping with that set forth in Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights [and] 2. To request that the State submit a report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights no later than March 12, 2008, indicating all the measures it has taken to comply with the orders laid out by the Court. […] 3. The briefs of April 18 and September 17, 2008 by which the State of Peru (hereinafter, the "State" or "Peru) referred to the compliance with the Judgment. 4. The communications of February 21, May 21 and October 17, 2008 by means of which the victims’ representatives (hereinafter, the “representatives") submitted their observations to the status of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The communications of June 6 and November 3, 2008 by which the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Commission” or the “Inter-American Commission”) submitted the observations to the status of compliance with the Judgment. Considering: 1. That, it is an inherent power of the judicial functions of the Court to monitor compliance with its decisions.