21 operative paragraphs. Having almost three and a half years gone by, there is no evidence that the appropriate and sufficient actions for the construction of the monument were carried out. Therefore, this Court urges the State that if within a month the artist chosen by the next of kin of the victims does not inform of the quote for the elaboration of the monument, it continue with the process started with the state entity chosen in a timely manner, taking into account the suggestions made by the representatives that have already been informed to the State, so it may arbitrate the means necessary to remove any possible obstacle of an administrative nature in order to comply with this measure of reparation, whose real symbolic value as a guarantee of non-repetition of such grave acts in the future continues to exist. Therefore, the Tribunal will continue monitoring compliance of this measure, for which the State shall inform of the progress and results achieves in relation to the commitments acquired. * * * Publication of the judgment (fifteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment) 50. That with regard to compliance with the obligation to publish certain parts of the Judgment, within a six-month term computed as of its notification, for a single time, in the Official Gazette and another newspaper of national circulation, the State informed that it held a meeting in April 2007 with the next of kin of the victims and that at the same they agreed to make the publication in an additional offprint inside the most important newspaper of national circulation in the country (“El Tiempo”). During the hearing, the State expressed that the publication was made on August 27, 2007 and in order to guarantee its diffusion it inserted an ad in the first page of the newspaper “El Tiempo” indicating the publication of the additional offprint. It also stated that the publication had been made in the Official Gazette. 51. That the representatives acknowledged that the publications had been made through a permanent and respectful negotiation process between the Government and the representatives. Despite the aforementioned, they observed that “the publication went unnoticed by the general population and therefore the objective that it have an impact on the society, so that the facts do not occur again, was not reached,” since the size and font of the publication were not adequate. During the hearing, they reiterated that the ad referring to the publication was not visible. On its part, the Commission stated that Colombia had complied with this obligation. 52. That the Court observes that, according to that stated in the Judgment, the State should make the corresponding publications within a six-month term. The Commission and the representatives informed that the mentioned publication had been made in a newspaper of national circulation and at the hearing the State presented a newspaper article (supra Having Seen Paragraph 22). The Tribunal positively values that informed regarding the fact that there had been an agreement in reference to the manner in which said publication would be made and considers that the State has complied with this provision. * * * Payment of compensations and reimbursement of costs and expenses (Sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth operative paragraphs of the Judgment)