a.- Next of kin of Luis Eduardo González González: -Luis Eduardo González (son), on December 22, 2011, received the approximate equivalent of USD 23,109.00 because he was born during his mother’s deprivation of liberty. -Raúl Oscar González, (brother) on December 20, 2011, received the equivalent of USD 28,879.00 -Daniel Edgardo González, (brother) on December 23, 2011, received the equivalent of USD 28,855.00. b.- Next of kin of Óscar Tassino Asteazu: -Karina Tassino Flores (daughter), on January 25, 2012, received the equivalent of USD 29,463.00 -Pablo Marcelo Tassino Flores (son), on January 25, 2012, received the equivalent of USD 29,463.00 c.- Next of kin of Silvia Reyes: -Stella Reyes Sedarri (sister), on August 2, 2011, received the equivalent of USD 30,455.00. -Celia Sedarri Aparicio (mother), on August 2, 2011, received the equivalent of USD 30,455.00. d.- Next of kin of Diana Maidanik: -Flora Potasnik Cogan (mother), on May 13, 2013, received the equivalent of USD 34,210.00. -Ana Loleley Guliak Potasnik (sister), on May 13, 2013, received the equivalent of USD 34,210.00. e.- Next of kin of Laura Raggio: -Horacio Enrique Raggio Odizzio (brother), on August 8, 2013, received the equivalent of USD 30,224.00. -Daniel Raggio Odizzio (brother), on August 8, 2013, received the equivalent of USD 30,224.00. 274. The Court has developed in its case law the concept of pecuniary damages and the assumptions that give rise to compensate them. The Court has established that pecuniary damages presuppose “the loss of or the detriment to the income of the victims, the expenses incurred as a result of the facts, and the monetary consequences that have a causal nexus with the facts of the sub judice case.”294 It has pointed out, moreover, that non-pecuniary damages can include “the suffering and afflictions caused to the direct victims and their relatives, detriment to values that are very significant for individuals, as well as non-monetary alterations in the conditions of existence of the victim or the victim’s family.”295 275. As to pecuniary damages, the representative did not confirm specific disbursements, related to the search for justice and/or the whereabouts of the disappeared persons, made by the next of kin of Mr. González González, Mr. Tassino Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 22, 2002. Series C No. 91, para. 43 and Case of the Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. Guatemala, para. 208. 294 Case of the “Street children” (Villagrán Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of May 26, 2001. Series C No. 77, para. 84 and Case of the Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. Guatemala, para. 209. 295 71