information, without prejudice to any measures necessary for maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the criminal investigation or the search itself. c) The search should be carried out by means of a “comprehensive strategy,” taking into consideration all reasonable hypotheses about the disappearance, rejecting none except those that cannot be supported based on objective and verifiable criteria. This strategy should “take into account the contextual analysis.” d) “[T]he activities to be performed are determined in an integrated fashion, through all necessary and appropriate means and procedures for the identification, release or exhumation of the disappeared person or establishment of the person’s identity. The comprehensive search strategy should include an action plan and a timeline and should be evaluated periodically.” e) The search “should be centralized under, or coordinated by, a competent body that ensures effective coordination with all the other entities whose cooperation is needed for the search to be effective, exhaustive and prompt.” f) “The search for the disappeared person and the criminal investigation of the persons responsible for the disappearance should be mutually reinforcing.” “When the search is conducted by non-judicial authorities independent of those that make up the justice system, mechanisms and procedures should be established to ensure cooperation, coordination and an exchange of information.” 140. In order to accomplish the above, the State shall, within three months of the notification of this judgment, develop a specific search plan for Óscar Iván Tabares Toro. This plan shall meet the standards established in the preceding two paragraphs. Colombia shall ensure the participation of Mr. Tabares Toro’s relatives who have been declared victims in this judgment and/or their representatives in the development of the specific search plan. The State shall not use the established timeframe, or any delays in the adoption of the plan ordered, to suspend search efforts. The State shall immediately inform this Court once it has developed the search plan, sending the Court a copy of the plan document. This is independent of the one-year period the State has to submit its first report, as ordered in operative paragraph 12 of this judgment. D. Measure of rehabilitation 141. The Commission requested as a measure of rehabilitation the implementation of a program of psychological and psychosocial care that is appropriate for the relatives of the disappeared victim. 142. The representatives asked the Court to grant the relatives of Óscar Iván Tabares Toro free medical and psychological treatment that is specific to their situation as victims of serious human rights violations and that continues for as long as necessary. They also noted that the Program for Psychosocial Care and Comprehensive Health of Victims (PAPSIVI), created by the Victims’ Law, does not meet the standards of rehabilitation established by the Court in its settled case law, as acknowledged in the case of Movilla Galarcio v. Colombia. The representatives therefore asked the Court to order alternative measures for the rehabilitation of Óscar Iván Tabares Toro's family and to apply the provisions of the judgment of that case, ordering the State to provide a sum for each of the victims to use for their comprehensive health care, including those who reside outside of Colombia. 143. The State noted that the purpose of PAPSIVI is to guarantee health assistance and physical, mental, and/or psychosocial rehabilitation for victims of serious human rights violations and violations of international humanitarian law in the context of Colombia’s armed conflict. To this end, the program provides psychosocial healthcare free of charge using various interdisciplinary strategies. 144. The Court has determined that the personal integrity of Mr. Tabares Toro’s relatives has been harmed (supra para. 121). Accordingly, as it has done in other cases, 175 the Court finds it necessary to order a measure of reparation to provide appropriate treatment for the physical, psychological, and/or Cf. Case of Barrios Altos v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C No. 87, paras. 42 and 45, and Case of Cortés Espinoza v. Ecuador. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs. Judgment of October 18, 2022. Series C 468, para. 172. 175 33