to the best banking practices on the administration of third-party funds, with full respect for the confidentiality and personal data of the victims and their heirs, in order to comply with the Judgment. Likewise, they requested that the State of Chile be ordered that the updated determination of the amounts and their payment for each one of the installments be made directly into the aforementioned account and with the collaboration of said financial institution. The same practice should apply to the payment of expenses and costs during the compliance stage and the updated reversion of the balances 10 years after notification of the Judgment, with the common representative having to inform the Court that said payments have been made. 15. The Commission observed that clarifying the doubts put forward by the State can facilitate the process of monitoring the Judgment and expedite compliance with the reparation measures, which is extremely important in the instant case given the advanced age of the victims. However, it did not specifically comment on actual issues submitted in the request for interpretation. A.2. Considerations of the Court 16. The Court considers it pertinent to clarify the meaning of the expression "annual installments" used in paragraph 232 of the Judgment with respect to the method of compliance with the reparation measure ordered in the fourth operative paragraph, according to which: "[t]he State shall make cash payment of the amounts owed to the victims for restitution, under the terms set in paragraphs 205 to 209 and 232 to 238 of [the] Judgment”. In said paragraph, the Court determined the following: 232. The payment of the amounts granted by this judgment as restitution must be disbursed directly to the people whose names are listed in Annex 1 in three annual installments, the first to be paid within one year of notification of this judgment. The amounts of these installments should be calculated on the basis of the amounts given in Annex 2, to be updated to the date of payment according to the readjusted CPI calculated by the National Bureau of Statistics from July 31, 2020 through the time when payment is actually made, and the maximum allowable interest rate for readjustable operations as of that same date, based on the provisions of Article 63 of the Labor code (supra para. 207). After the State works out the individual amounts to be paid to each person, it must so notify the beneficiaries and their representatives as soon as possible. 17. Indeed, from the reading of the paragraph, doubts may arise as to the meaning of the term "installment" and this may impact the compliance with the order, without this fact changing the meaning of the Judgment. 18. Consequently, the Court emphasizes that the State must effectively pay the totality of the amounts established in the Judgment as a restitution measure. This payment can be made in three installments, the first to be paid no later than December 21, 2022; the second no later than December 21, 2023; and the third no later than December 21, 2024. This division of the total payment into three installments is made for the benefit of the State. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the State may opt for a form of payment that is more beneficial to the victims and, therefore, transfer the full amounts awarded in one lump sum, no later than 21 December 2022. 19. Regarding the representatives' request that the Court require the State to establish a payment mechanism through the representative of the victims, this Court notes that the representatives had already made a similar request during the proceedings, which was referred to in paragraph 198 of the Judgment. On the other hand, in paragraph 209 of the 5