14 process to formulate a search plan, which would be presented by the Prosecutor on April 30, 2009, based on the information contained in the court file, the national protocol to search for disappeared people and the participation of the plaintiff. 22. That the representatives stated that the only search was conducted in November 2005, a year after the delivery of the Judgment and 18 years after the occurrence of the facts, and that the search has not been taken up again by the authorities in charge of the investigation due to the lack of resources. The representatives do not accept that the next-of-kin be summoned to render a statement if they do not know the purpose of said testimony, since they have presented the information they already know to the authorities and they do not know the whereabouts of their loved ones. On March 3, 2009 the Prosecutor in charge of the case ordered some measures tending to conduct a search for the disappeared people; for this reason, the Prosecutor requested the Technical Bureau of Investigations of the Solicitor General’s Office the appointment of a "special and exclusive” team to plan the search in the case at. Progress has been made in the design of the search plan with the contribution of the representatives in their capacity as plaintiffs, who presented a proposal for the formulation of a strategic search plan made up by the Colombian Interdisciplinary Team for Forensic Work and Psychosocial Services (EQUITAS). In this regard, the representatives emphasized that this project is the result of the hearing convened by the Court; therefore, it is essential for the State to continue with the procedure, providing the Prosecutor in charge with all the necessary technical, economic and scientific resources and to order security measures to carry out the research in the field. 23. That the Commission valued the will expressed by the State. It pointed out that it is vital to devise and execute a search plan, based on the necessary resources to carry out all actions and it also called for responsiveness and execution in this process of search that has been practically bogged down since November 2005. 24. That this Court notes that only one search procedure has been carried out since the delivery of the Judgment in the instant case in the year 2004 and that since November 2005, no other procedure has been conducted. Therefore, upon the acknowledgment of the commitments made by the State in this sense, the Tribunal considers it is of vital importance to devise and develop, as practicable as possible, a plan to search for the mortal remains, pursuant to specialized technical and scientific parameters, since the passage of time hinders the effective execution of this measure of reparation. Furthermore, the State cannot seek protection in the lack of economic resources in order not to expedite the investigation and search of the remains. In this regard, the Court has not received information on the presentation of said plan by the Prosecutor, which should have been submitted by April 30, 2009, according to the own commitments made by the State (supra Having Seen clause 14). Therefore, in the next reports, the State, the Commission and the representatives shall have to provide updated information in this respect. * * * 25. That in relation to the obligation to erect a monument in memory of the victims and, in a public ceremony in the presence of the next of kin of the victims, to place a plaque with the names of the 19 tradesmen (operative paragraph seven and