17 trust and elaboration of the facing process of the victims, which began at the diagnosis phase.” 32. That the Commission acknowledged the fact that this measure of reparation must be seen from a psychosocial perspective, it observed the delay in the diagnosis phase and it considered it was necessary to allocate resources to the treatment phase. It also considered it was important to learn about a schedule to conclude the diagnosis, to begin with the treatment and the logistic aspects of the implementation. 33. That the Court values the actions taken as a part of execution of this measure as well as the willingness to include this aspect in the execution of the agreement mentioned by the State for the comprehensive treatment of the victims of the armed conflict from a psychosocial point of view. The Tribunal values the efforts shown by the State when executing an agreement between the Ministry of Social Protection and the United Nations Development Program; the psychosocial nature of the measures that are being adopted and the investment and procedure in the system of evaluation and treatment. Moreover, this Tribunal expressed satisfaction that the State has adopted a comprehensive approach for the implementation of this measure, which includes the different cases where the Court has delivered judgments and ordered this measure of reparation. 34. That, in addition, the Court notes that the appropriate treatment for the victims’ next-of-kin was an obligation of immediate compliance on the part of the State; therefore, the delays previously mentioned are not positive. This Tribunal notes that a great part of the next-of-kin of the victims in this case has already been diagnosed and, as a result, it urges the State to conclude the diagnosis procedure of all next-of-kin that require so and begin with the treatment phase by means of specialized institutions, as soon as practicable, in order not to affect the process that is being developed and gain the confidence of the victims in the health institutions in charge of providing the treatment. Moreover, without detriment to the measures the State shall adopt within the framework of the general health system, it is necessary for the State to provide, free of charge, the victims of the instant case with thorough and comprehensive preferential treatment, including the medicines they may require. Certainly, the consent and cooperation of the beneficiaries of these measures are essential for the effective provision of the treatment owed to them. To this end, it is important that the State authorities continue having the cooperation of the representatives to include the rest of the people. Bearing in mind the commitments made by the State, the State shall continue informing, occasionally, on the progress made and the results obtained in the implementation of this measure. * * * 35. That as to the obligation to establish the necessary conditions for the members of the family of the victim, Antonio Flórez Contreras, who are in exile, to return to Colombia, if they so wish, and cover the costs they incur as a result of their return (operative paragraph ten and paragraphs 279 of the Judgment) the State repeated its willingness to conduct the necessary studies on security and risk in relation to the members of the family. However, it considered it was necessary for the Colombian Jurists Commission to provide information on the willingness of the