victims of all types of crimes and extends the opportunity to participate as a complainant to the siblings of the dead or disappeared person.159 C. Measures of satisfaction 112. The representatives asked the Court to order, as a measure of satisfaction, the publication of the “salient points” of the judgment in “at least two newspapers with national circulation and in the Official Gazette of the Argentine Republic,” as well as the judgment in its entirety and the public hearing held in the framework of the case, at the "Judicial Information Center, under the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation." 113. The State, after acknowledging responsibility, made no specific reference to this measure of satisfaction. 114. As it has done in other cases,160 the Court decides that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this judgment, in an appropriate and legible font: a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette of the Argentine Republic; b) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a newspaper with broad national circulation, and c) this judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on an official website of the State. The State must advise this Court immediately when it has issued each of the publications ordered, regardless of the one-year time frame for presentation of its first report, as established in the thirteenth operative paragraph of this judgment. D. Guarantees of non-repetition D.1. Raising awareness among State officials and training them on racial discrimination 115. The Commission asked the Court to order the State to “train State security forces officials on the standards set forth in Merits Report No. 146/18, regarding their obligations to protect the lives and integrity of the people in their custody.” 116. For their part, the representatives asked the Court to require that the State: “e.3. Incorporate specific content on racism and arbitrary detentions based on racial profiling into the official curricula of the security forces training programs, making special mention of the death of José Delfín Acosta Martínez and the judgment of this […] Court ”. 117. The State made no reference to this measure of reparation. 118. This Court deems it pertinent to order the State to, within a period of two years, include training in the regular training received by the Police of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires and the Argentine Federal Police on the discriminatory nature of the stereotypes based on race, color, nationality, or ethnic origin, as well as the use of racial profiling in the exercise of police authority to make arrests, along with raising awareness on the negative impact that the use of stereotypes has on people of African descent. The police training must include studying this judgment. Cf. Article 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Text http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/275000-279999/276819/norma.htm 159 available at: Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Valle Ambrosio et al. v. Argentina, supra, para. 63. 160 34