5 for the medical and psychological treatment of Mr. Wilson Gutiérrez Soler and the psychological treatment of his son, Kevin Daniel Gutiérrez Niño. 14. That the Inter-American Court ordered the State to “provide, free of charge, at the health-care facilities the State itself may indicate psychological and psychiatric treatment to [the victims named in operative paragraph two of the Judgment] require". In accordance to the terms of paragraph 91.i) of the Judgment, the victims’ representatives requested this type of reparation. 15. That even if this measure aims at contributing to the reparation of the physical and psychological damage that derived from the violations committed, the method ordered for its compliance cannot be modified during the stage of monitoring compliance with the Judgment. Therefore, as long as some of the beneficiaries live abroad, the State will be precluded from providing the medical and psychological treatment so ordered in that respect. 16. That, as is evident from the information provided, the victims' next- of-kin that reside in Colombia have not yet received the medical and psychological treatment ordered due to failure of communication between the parties. The Court repeats that, in order to properly fulfill this measure, the State should manage the concerns of the nextof-kin. The representatives should cooperate so that this can be possible. * * * 17. That, on April 2 and September 11, 2006, the State published in the national weekly newspaper, called “El Espectador” and in the official gazette, respectively, the corresponding paragraphs of the Judgment delivered by this Tribunal in this matter. The State submitted copies of said publications. 18. That the representatives expressed their dissent from the publication made in the weekly newspaper “El Espectador” of the Judgment delivered in this matter since the “letter, size and placement of such Judgment in the newspaper do not comply with the purpose of the measure ordered by the Court”. Accordingly, the State expressed that "it is more than willing to fulfill the judgments delivered by the Inter-American Court, not just from a formal point of view”, so that it offered a new publication of this case. The State informed that on August 27, 2007 it held a meeting with the representatives, in which the National Police Department submitted a proposal of the new publication. Said proposal would have been rejected by the representatives after considering that that means of communication is not good enough to broadcast the information. The State informed that it agreed on examining other possibilities in order to publish a shorter text in order to facilitate the budgetary processing of the Police. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it requested the Court to declare that this measure is fulfilled, even though the steps “that in good faith the State is taking in order to carry out the publication of the Judgment for the second time". The representatives pointed out there still are some restraints in such regard, for that such compliance would only be pending within the domestic venue.