2 Unanimously, that: 5. The State violated, to the detriment of Mr. Urcesino Ramírez Rojas, during the second judicial proceedings against him, the Right to a Fair Trial embodied in Article 8(1) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, in accordance with paragraphs 163 to 172 of the […] Judgment. Unanimously, that: 6. The State violated, to the detriment of Mr. Wilson García Asto and Urcesino Ramírez Rojas, during the initial judicial proceedings against them, Article 9 of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, in accordance with paragraphs 197 to 202 and 205 to 208 of the […] Judgment. In a vote of six to one, that: 7. A violation of Article 9, in accordance with paragraphs 179 to 195 of the […] Judgment, was not proven. Judge Medina Quiroga dissenting. Unanimously, that: 8. The State violated, to the detriment of Mr. Wilson García Asto and Mr. Urcesino Ramírez Rojas, the Right to Humane Treatment embodied in Articles 5(1) and 5(2) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, in accordance with paragraphs 220 to 229, 232 and 233 of the […] Judgment. Unanimously, that: 9. The State violated, to the detriment of Mr. Napoleón García Tuesta, Ms. Celia Asto Urbano, Ms. Elisa García Asto, Mr. Gustavo García, Ms. María Alejandra Rojas, Mr. Marcos Ramírez Álvarez, Ms. Santa Ramírez Rojas, Mr. Pedro Ramírez Rojas, Ms. Filomena Ramírez Rojas, Mr. Julio Ramírez Rojas, Ms. Obdulia Ramírez Rojas, Mr. Marcelino Ramírez Rojas, and Ms. Adela Ramírez Rojas, the rights embodied in Article 5(1) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, in respect to paragraphs 230, 231, 234, and 235 of the […] Judgment. Unanimously, that: 10. [The] Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation, in terms of paragraph 268 thereof. AND ORDER[ED]: Unanimously, that: 11. The State shall provide Mr. Wilson García Asto with free medical and psychological care, including free medicine, through its health services, in terms of paragraph 280 of the […] Judgment.