ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2003* SUÁREZ ROSERO CASE COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The judgment on merits delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court”) in the Suárez Rosero case, on November 12, 1997, by which: unanimously, 1. [It found] that the State of Ecuador violated, to the detriment of Rafael Iván Suárez-Rosero, Article 7 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms indicated in paragraphs 38 to 66 of [the] judgment. 2. [It found] that the State of Ecuador violated, to the detriment of Rafael Iván Suárez-Rosero, Article 8 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms indicated in paragraphs 57 to 83 of [the] judgment. 3. [It found] that the State of Ecuador violated, to the detriment of Rafael Iván Suárez-Rosero, Article 5 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms indicated in paragraphs 84 to 92 of [the] judgment. 4. [It found] that the State of Ecuador violated, to the detriment of Rafael Iván Suárez-Rosero, Article 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms indicated in paragraphs 61 to 66 of [the] judgment. 5. [It found] that the final paragraph of the unnumbered article after Article 114 of the Criminal Code of Ecuador violates Article 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Articles 7(5) and 1(1) of the same. 6. [It found] that Ecuador must order an investigation to determine the persons responsible for the human rights violations referred to in this judgment and, where possible, punish them. 7. [It found] that Ecuador [was] obliged to pay a fair indemnity to the victim and his relatives and to compensate them for any expenses incurred in their representations relating to this proceeding. 8. [It ordered] the initiation of the Reparations Stage, for which purpose it authorize[d] the President to adopt in due course such measures as [might] be necessary. 2. The judgment on reparations delivered by the Court on January 20, 1999, in which: unanimously * Judge Hernán Salgado Pesantes advised the Court that, owing to circumstances beyond his control, he would be unable to attend the deliberation and signature of this Order.