200. If, for reasons attributable to the beneficiaries of the compensation or their heirs, it is not possible to pay the amount determined within the indicated time frame, the State shall deposit the amount in their favor in an account or certificate of deposit in a solvent Brazilian financial institution, in United States dollars or the equivalent in the national currency, and in the most favorable financial conditions permitted by banking law and practice. If those funds are not claimed within ten years, they shall be returned to the State along with the interest accrued. 201. The amounts set in the present judgment as measures of reparation for damage and as reimbursement for costs and expenses shall be rendered to the stated individuals in full with no reductions resulting from eventual tax charges. 202. If the State falls behind, it shall pay interest on the amount owed corresponding to banking interest on arrears in the Federative Republic of Brazil. Therefore, X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS THE COURT DECIDES: unanimously, 1. To reject the preliminary objection for ratione temporis, pursuant to paragraphs 20 to 22 of this judgment. 2. To reject the preliminary objection regarding the failure to exhaust domestic remedies, pursuant to paragraphs 26 to 28 of this judgment. 3. To reject the preliminary objection concerning the “fourth instance,” pursuant to paragraphs 32 and 33 of this judgment. DECLARES, unanimously, that: 4. The State is responsible for violating the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection contained in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with the duty to respect and ensure rights established in Article 1(1) of that convention, to the detriment of Geraldo Gomes Pimenta, Maria da Glória Sales Pimenta, Sérgio Sales Pimenta, Marcos Sales Pimenta, José Sales Pimenta, Rafael Sales Pimenta, André Sales Pimenta, and Daniel Sales Pimenta. Moreover, the State violated the right to the truth to the detriment of Gabriel Sales Pimenta’s family. All of the above is under the terms of paragraphs 82 to 121 of this judgment. 5. The State is responsible for violating the right to personal integrity established in Article 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with the duty to respect and ensure rights established in Article 1(1) of that convention, to the detriment of Geraldo Gomes Pimenta, Maria da Glória Sales Pimenta, Sérgio Sales Pimenta, Marcos Sales Pimenta, José Sales Pimenta, Rafael Sales Pimenta, André Sales Pimenta, and Daniel Sales Pimenta. AND ESTABLISHES, unanimously, that: 51