ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS∗ OF FEBRUARY 2, 2006 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REGARDING COLOMBIA MATTER OF THE PEACE COMMUNITY OF SAN JOSÉ DE APARTADÓ HAVING SEEN: 1. The Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court”, or “the Court”) of October 9, 2000. 2. The Order of the Inter-American Court of November 24, 2000, whereby the Order of the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”) of October 9, 2000 was ratified in all its parts (supra Having Seen clause No. 1). 3. The Order of the Court of June 18, 2002, which called upon the State of Colombia (hereinafter “the State” or “Colombia) to maintain the provisional measures set forth in the Order of the President of the Court (hereinafter the “President”) of October 9, 2000 and the Order of the Court of November 24, 2000 (supra Having Seen clauses No. 1 and 2). 4. The Order of the Inter-American Court of November 17, 2004, which called upon the State, inter alia, to maintain the measures taken and to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to effectively protect the life and the right to humane treatment of the members of the Peace Community of San José de Apartadó (hereinafter “the Peace Community” or “the Community”), as set forth in the Order of the President of October 9, 2000 and the Orders of the Court of November 24, 2000 and June 18, 2002. 5. The Order of the Inter-American Court of March 15, 2005, directing the State, inter alia, to adopt the provisional measures ordered by the Court, as set forth in the Order of the President of October 9, 2000 and the Orders of the Court of November 24, 2000, June 18, 2002 and November 17, 2004 for the benefit of all the members of the Peace Community. 6. The communication of the State, received on March 15, 2005, requesting a fifteen-day extension therefrom to submit the relevant report on provisional measures. The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of March 30, ∗ Judge Diego García-Sayán informed the Court that, for reasons beyond his control, he would not be able to attend the deliberation and signing of this Order.