criminal offense in accordance with international standards and the provisions of this Judgment (supra paras. 129 to 144). This obligation is binding on all the powers and organs of the State as a whole. 2.3 Training for public officials 178. The Inter-American Commission asked the Court to order the State to ensure the training of judges and other relevant officials on the comprehensive rights of children relating to the best interests of the child. It indicated that, in this case, the State’s responsibility arose, to a great extent, from the lack of training of its public officials. The Commission asked that, using a specific approach, the State conduct continuous training programs for public officials, above all, judicial officials, concerning adoption and determination of guardianship, custody or visiting regimes when children have been legally or illegally separated from their families, in accordance with the corpus juris on children and adolescents and the principle of the best interests of the child, as well as the principle of non-discrimination contained in the American Convention. 179. The representative requested this measure of reparation in similar terms to the Inter-American Commission. 180. The State did not refer to this measure of reparation. 181. In the past, this Court has referred to the importance of training public officials in this regard, indicating that it is not enough to establish judicial guarantees and protection if those who intervene in the proceedings lack sufficient training on what the best interests of the child involve and, consequently, on the effective protection of their rights.120 182. In this case, the Court has concluded that the violations of the rights of Mr. Fornerón and his daughter occurred basically due to the actions of the justice system of the province of Entre Ríos. Consequently, the Court establishes that the State must implement, within a reasonable time calculated as of notification of this Judgment and with the respective budgetary provisions, an compulsory program or course for judicial agents, including judges, defense counsel, prosecutors, legal advisers and other officials of the province of Entre Ríos who intervene in the administration of juvenile justice, that includes among others aspects, international human rights standards, particularly with regard to the rights of the child, and their best interests, and the principle of non-discrimination. 2.4. Publication of the Judgment 183. Neither the Commission nor the representatives asked the Court to order the State to publish this Judgment. Nevertheless, the Court considers it appropriate to establish that the State must publish once, within six months of notification of this Judgment, the official summary of the Judgment prepared by the Court in the State’s Official Gazette, as well as in the official gazette of the province of Entre Ríos. 3. Other measures requested 3.1. Education on the best interests of the child and right to an identity 184. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to incorporate the best interests of the child and the right to an identity into the educational curricula at all 120 Cf. Advisory Opinion OC-17/02, supra note 51, para. 79. 48