99 333. The Court finds it evident that some of the invoices submitted by the representatives relate to expenditures made in connection with the instant case. 382 These invoices amount to approximately USD 2,422.00 (two thousand four hundred and twenty-two United States dollars). However, other invoices and payments of fees do not show a clear link with the case. 383 The Court also notes that the representatives did not submit information regarding the expenses incurred in connection with the public hearing held at the seat of the Court. Nevertheless, the Court considers it evident that such representation generated, at least, transportation, lodging and food costs. The Court also considers that the actuarial report prepared by Roberto A. Molina Cruz (supra para. 332) lacks information and evidentiary support that would allow the Court to understand on what basis the amounts of costs and expenses incurred by the representatives and those that could be incurred in the process of monitoring compliance with the judgment were established. 334. In view of the foregoing, the Court establishes, in equity, the sum of USD 50,000 (fifty thousand United States dollars) for expenses incurred in the proceedings before the inter-American human rights system. Said amount shall be delivered to the Asociación Bufete Jurídico Popular within one year of notification of this judgment. During the stage of monitoring compliance with this judgment, the Court may order the State to reimburse the victims or their representatives for subsequent reasonable and duly proven expenses. G. Method of compliance with the payments ordered 335. Payment of the compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage established in this judgment shall be made directly to the persons indicated therein, within two years from the date of notification of this judgment. Fifty per cent of the amount shall be paid during the course of the first year to each victim, while the remaining amount may be paid during the second year, as indicated in paragraph 327 of this judgment. In the event of the death of the victims prior to the payment of the respective amounts, as well as in the case of disappeared victims, the amounts shall be paid to their beneficiaries, as established in paragraphs 327 and 328 of this judgment. 336. The reimbursement of costs and expenses established in this judgment shall be made directly to the persons indicated therein, within one year of notification of this judgment, pursuant to paragraph 334. 337. The State shall comply with its monetary obligations through payment in United States dollars, or the equivalent in local currency, using for the respective calculation the exchange rate in effect on the New York Stock Exchange, United States of America, on the day prior to payment. 338. If, for reasons that can be attributed to the beneficiaries of the compensation or their heirs, it is not possible to pay the amounts established within the time frame indicated, the State shall deposit said amounts in their favor, in an account or certificate of deposit in a solvent Guatemalan financial institution, in United States dollars, and on the most favorable financial terms permitted by banking law and practice. If the corresponding compensation is not claimed within ten years, the amounts shall be returned to the State with the accrued interest. 382 The documentary evidence submitted by the representatives includes payments for: certifications issued by the municipality of Rabinal; burial containers; the hire of a room to hold an informative talk; food; transportation; photocopies; fuel, and notarial and fiscal stamps, all in relation to the processing of this case between 2007 and 2014. 383 These include: payment of fees to María Dolores Itzep Manuel, between 2007 and 2014; payments to Sandra López and Reina Isabel Osorio Tecú for technical investigation services provided from 2007 to 2008; payments to Abelina Osorio Sis for technical services as a lawyer between 2007 and 2008, and payments to Carlos Enrique de Paz Alvarado for internship between 2013 and 2014. Likewise, it was not possible to verify the connection with the present case of certain payments for food, transportation, photocopies, printing and internet services, as well as the payment for the registration of a court order, all of which were made in 2011.