19 73. On February 7, 2002, the Office of the Public Prosecutor charged Saturnino Antonio Gamarra Acosta and José David Schémbori Ocampos with the crimes of deprivation of liberty, forced disappearance and torture against Juan Arrom and Anuncio Martí.91 Subsequently, the Public Prosecutor’s Office indicted the Head of the Judicial Investigation Center of the Office of the Public Prosecutor, Javier Cazal Elizeche, for the same crimes.92 On February 14, 2002, the arrest of Juan Carlos González Villar was ordered, because he was the tenant of the house where the alleged victims were found.93 However, it could not be processed because the identity card number in the lease contract did not match with the name of Juan Carlos González Villar.94 74. On February 7 and 26, 2002, Juan Arrom and Anuncio Martí, respectively, filed individual criminal complaints for the facts of which they claimed to be victims.95 75. During the investigations, statements were received from the alleged victims, their next of kin, the Minister of the Interior, the Minister of Justice and Labor, the Attorney General, three prosecutors from the Public Prosecutor’s Office, and at least 16 police officers, and 87 people who might have had information about what happened, or who might be involved.96 Additionally, diverse information was requested,97 a reconstruction of the alleged arrest of Juan Arrom and Anuncio Martí98 and their discovery99 was carried out. Spoken portraits were also made based on what was stated by Juan Arrom.100 76. On January 29, 2003, a criminal report on the evidence collected in the inspections and raids carried out on January 30 and 31, 2002 was presented.101 The report notes that on February 13, 2002, the studies that would be carried out on this evidence were scheduled for between February Cf. Record of charges against Antonio Gamarra and José David Schémbori of February 7, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 4957 to 4959). 92 Cf. Record of charges against Javier Cazal Elizeche of February 21, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 5016 to 5017). 93 Resolution No. 12 of February 14, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 4991 and 4992). 94 Note of February 15, 2002 from the National Police (evidence file, f. 4989). 95 Juan Arrom Suhurt's complaint was filed against the Deputy Police Commissioner, Saturnino Antonio Gamarra; The Director of the Center for Judicial Investigation, Javier Cazal, the Minister of Justice and Labor, Silvio Ferreira Fernández, Mr. Marcos Antonio Álvarez Pereira , the Minister of the Interior of the Executive Power , Julio César Fanego Arellano , and the Prosecutor Hugo Velázquez Moreno, all of them for punishable acts against freedom, serious coercion, kidnapping, threat, attempted homicide, forced disappearance, serious injury, serious injury in the exercise of public functions, torture and persecution of innocents, all of the above in criminal association. Complaint filed by Juan Arrom Suhurt on February 7, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 4808 to 4810). The Anuncio Martí complaint was filed against the same persons included in Juan Arrom's complaint, with the exception of Messrs. Fanego Arellano and Velázquez Moreno. Likewise, the complaint was also filed against the Deputy Commissioner in charge of the Crime Investigation Department of the National Police, José David Schémbori Ocampos, the Police Sub-Officer Pablo Morínigo, Commissioner Roberto González Cuquejo, Mrs. Gladys Maubet de Ferreira, wife of the former Minister Silvio Ferreira, Inspector Officer Gomez, Officer 1 or Martinez, Inspector Officer Nelson Alderete, Inspector Officer Julio Diaz, Officer Limenza and Officer Morínigo, for the crimes of kidnapping, torture, forced disappearance, serious injury, illicit association, serious coercion, threat, attempted homicide, serious injury in the exercise of public functions, persecution of innocents, all in criminal association. cf. Complaint filed by Anuncio Martí on February 26, 2002 (evidence file, f. 526). 96 cf. File labeled Saturnino Antonio Gamarra et al. on torture and others (evidence file, fs. 4697 to 8554). 97 See, for example, Communication of March 8, 2002 (evidence file, f. 5167); Note from the Criminal Prosecutor No. 309 of March 8, 2002 (evidence file, f. 5186); Official letter No. 151 of the National Police of March 11, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 5193 to 5196); Note from the Criminal Prosecutor of March 8, 2002 (evidence file, f. 4899); Request of March 11, 2002 (evidence file, f. 5190). 98 Cf. Action to reconstruct the events of April 18, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 5519 to 5525). 99 Cf. Record of proceedings of November 28, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 6536 to 6547). 100 Cf. Minutes No. 027 / 2002; Act No. 028 / 2002; Record No. 029 / 2002 and Record No. 030 / 2002 (evidence file, fs. 5426 to 5432). For his part, Anuncio Martí reported that “due to [his] personal impossibility and on the recommendation of [his] lawyer [he] abstain[s] from making the corresponding identification.” Cf. Record of April 11, 2002 (evidence file, fs. 5435 and 5436). 101 Cf. Criminal report of January 29, 2003 (evidence file, fs. 7269 to 7280). 91