chosen by mutual agreement with the beneficiaries, taking into account the circumstances and particular needs of each case.” 311. The State referred to the support provided to the victims “through the Executive Commission for Attention to Victims of the State of Mexico, as described in the report submitted to the Human Rights Commission on October 23, 2020, who were included in the State Register of Victims with the numbers REV-059-2019-RDH (Reyes Alpízar Ortiz) and REV-060-2019-RDH (Daniel García Rodríguez).” It also referred in detail to the psychological care provided in the posttraumatic stress clinics in Tlalnepantla to Daniel García Rodríguez and Reyes Alpízar Ortiz, as well as to their families, by the Social Work Unit and the Psychosocial Care Unit. The State also reiterated its willingness “to provide medical services to the beneficiaries, through referrals to the public health services they require, based on their individual diagnoses.” 312. In the instant case, the Court has determined the harm caused to the personal integrity of Daniel García Rodríguez and Reyes Alpízar Ortiz due to acts of torture (supra Chapter VIII.2.B.1). Therefore, this Court deems it necessary to order a measure of reparation that ensures adequate treatment for the psychological and/or psychiatric ailments suffered by these two victims. Consequently, the Court orders the State to provide them with the medical, psychological and/or psychiatric treatment they may require, in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the following paragraphs. 313. Treatment should be provided to the victims free of charge and as a matter of priority, and should include the provision of any medications that may be necessary and, where appropriate, transportation and other directly related and necessary expenses. Treatment should be provided, to the extent possible, at the health centers nearest to the beneficiaries’ places of residence, for as long as necessary. When providing treatment, the particular circumstances and needs of each victim should be considered, as agreed with that victim and after an individual assessment. 281 314. The beneficiaries have six months from notification of this judgment to inform the State of their desire to receive medical, psychological and/or psychiatric care. 282 In turn, the State shall have a maximum term of six months from receiving said request, to provide the treatment requested. In any case, regardless of these time limits, the State must comply with the measure as soon as possible. If the beneficiaries do not communicate their intention to receive medical, psychological and/or psychiatric care within the established term, the State is exempted from providing it. F. Other measures requested 315. The representatives requested that the State be ordered to offer “a public apology to the victims and to carry out a public act of acknowledgement of responsibility for the facts of this case in the Municipality of Atizapán de Zaragoza, where Daniel García Rodríguez was arrested, held in arraigo and exhibited as a criminal. They argued that said act should take place within one year of notification of this judgment and that representatives of the highest level of the Federal Government and of the Government of the state of Mexico should participate in it. The organization and other details of this public ceremony must be discussed previously with members of the García Rodríguez family, whose expenses for attending the ceremony must be covered by the State.” The 281 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 270; Case of Poblete Vilches et al. v. Chile. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 8, 2018. Series C No. 349, para. 231, and Case of Garzón Guzmán et al. v. Ecuador. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 1, 2021. Series C No. 434, para. 114. Cf. Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of August 31, 2010. Series C No. 216, para. 253, and Case of Garzón Guzmán et al. v. Ecuador, supra, para. 114. 282 -78-